this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
138 points (99.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6583 readers
271 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's worth noting that he also fired many of the staff who know how to ensure that they're actually safe, as well as the staff who would approve financing.

(page 2) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

If the nuclear industry is going to be quadrupled, and gas and oil are similarly enlarged, and renewables are at least not shrinking, what are people supposed to do with all that extra power in such a short time? I mean, I get that induced demand is a thing but... a quadrupling of long-standing industries? Is there any intention for this plan to be realistic?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Trump doesn't do realism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Soviet quality nuclear plants. Great idea. What could possibly go wrong?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

We need to work on permitting of New plants. Not new construction of Old plants.

But I get it, Don likes towers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I seem to remember something going wrong before when corners were cut with nuclear...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Probably, the comapny behind the reactors (the only one who has a financial benefit) promised to build a Trump tower instead of the cooling tower, so 2 companies/families benefit now and 99.9% have to pay for that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If the trump tower exists over the reactor, hopefully he will move in permanently

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›