this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
121 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6583 readers
259 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's worth noting that he also fired many of the staff who know how to ensure that they're actually safe, as well as the staff who would approve financing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago

great idea, nothing wrong will come from pressuring the nuclear power regulators. nuh uh.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

It really depends on what these reactors are going to be used for. Are they going to be licensed to private corporations to power data centers, or are they going to provide power to citizens homes?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 21 hours ago (42 children)

Beginning investments nuclear at this point when renewables so obviously to everyone in the know are beating them on all accounts is extremely on brand for someone as dumb as Trump

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Nuclear is the single best technology humans have invented. A broken clock is right twice a day.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Being able to harness the power of atoms is cool, but directly harnessing the power of a star is arguably far cooler.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I'm confused as to what you think powers a star.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

They are suggesting that pursuing fusion is better…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Well both of you are incorrect because a star is when gravity creates enough energy to cause nuclear fusion.

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago

If there's one thing that you should compromise on when it comes to nuclear power it's definitely safety.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hey good news everyone, instead of 40 years to build a new reactor, it’ll only take 39 years. What a relief. Good thing we didn’t fall for all that free sunlight and wind bullshit!

Hey, maybe nuclear plants can run on clean coal!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

The one fucking thing you never want to cut corners on, and this clown is deregulating it. JFC.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

If the nuclear industry is going to be quadrupled, and gas and oil are similarly enlarged, and renewables are at least not shrinking, what are people supposed to do with all that extra power in such a short time? I mean, I get that induced demand is a thing but... a quadrupling of long-standing industries? Is there any intention for this plan to be realistic?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Feed the hungry AI, I guess?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

Trump doesn't do realism.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago

Soviet quality nuclear plants. Great idea. What could possibly go wrong?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

We need to work on permitting of New plants. Not new construction of Old plants.

But I get it, Don likes towers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

I seem to remember something going wrong before when corners were cut with nuclear...

load more comments
view more: next ›