this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37666 readers
322 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Honestly quite shocking news given their success, but I guess it's what happens when you chase tech company profits.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh look. Another successful company that couldn't manage their own success. Capitalism is going great.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Sure looks like Yet Another Case of Outside Investors Ruining It.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not how they managed success, it's that they ran out of it. Making a successful niche kitchen appliance is not a business, it's one of many things that a successful niche kitchen appliance business does.

Successful businesses also allocate capital optimally, build formidable brand and product moats, hire amazing managers and build fortified balance sheets. They forgot to do all that stuff. (See also: reddit)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I have an instant pot air fryer. They definitely made some attempts. But I imagine they kept trying to be the big mover and shaker and that’s expensive compared to just building a solid trustworthy brand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

undefined> Successful businesses also allocate capital optimally, build formidable brand and product moats, hire amazing managers and build fortified balance sheets. They forgot to do all that stuff. (See also: reddit)

Otherwise known as managing success. Once you have a successful cash flow you need to diversify it and build your business to have multiple cash flows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm undefined? 😟

Otherwise known as managing success. Once you have a successful cash flow you need to diversify it and build your business to have multiple cash flows.

Semantics I guess. Di-worse-ification isn't always the answer. They had a large product lineup, which was probably more expensive for them than it needed to be. They went under because they failed to fortify their balance sheet... rates went up and their debt crushed them.

Capitalism works fine just turning a profit while plenty of companies die chasing growth. It's just part of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For some reason the software inserted the "undefined" when I tried to quote your post. Growing pains of a new site I guess.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

🤣 I didn't think you were trying to tell me something, I figured the Lemmy code goofed somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's problem with being a one hit wonder. They had a decent product that became popular. Unfortunately there's only so many people who are in the market for a countertop pressure cooker.

Although there's plenty of other companies in the space like KitchenAid that have survived over the years.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea, true but there are plenty of companies that only make one product really well. I feel like it is more because they took a bunch of VC funding and had large pressures to grow their employee count that made it so unsustainable. That plus the extreme amount of competition that they have in the space.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've definitely noticed the cheap imitations of their product. I've even spotted one or two on the shelves at goodwill. I don't really see those as competition. There's plenty of other brands of stand mixers out there, yet KitchenAid is still considered a solid buy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Generally only by people who don't know any better. Anyone who is deep into stand mixers will point at Bosch or Ankarsum.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

there’s only so many people who are in the market for a countertop pressure cooker

The article mentions that

in 2021 it canceled $100 million worth of orders from retailers

So it doesn't sound like they just ran out of customers

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flowbee still sells 90,000 units a year and has been around since the 80s. Probably a lesson in there for Instant, I think.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally just bought one yesterday... Excited to see how well it will work out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been using mine since 2021, and despite the jokes my friends make, no one can actually tell the difference in my hair cut. It does help to have someone that can trim your neck line and ears though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd thought about getting one. Had one in the 90s. If you don't have a hair cut that needs a lot of attention then yeah, nobody notices. Clean, easy, no barber.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Just got mine this week.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh shit I wanted to buy one of those when I have a kitchen big enough to accommodate it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's OK, it's Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which means the company will still exist, at least for a while. Also Crock-Pot's pressure cooker is pretty good IME if you can't find an Instant Pot in time