this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
896 points (99.9% liked)

World News

44020 readers
3516 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump renewed calls for the US to annex Greenland for "national security" reasons during an Oval Office briefing, claiming "I think it will happen."

Greenland's outgoing Prime Minister Múte Egede responded on Facebook: "Enough is enough," and planned to summon all Greenland's political parties for a joint rejection.

Likely incoming Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen also called Trump's statement "inappropriate."

Trump also undermined Denmark's claim to Greenland, saying it was "very far away and really has nothing to do" with the island.

Danish Defense Committee Chairman Rasmus Jarlov warned that US annexation "would mean war between two NATO countries."

(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I have a hard time believing the public, much less military members, have the stomach to do something like this. There's zero moral standing in it and it seems like all modern overt military actions by the US needed to have something its participants and supporters could hold up to say "I'm doing this to make the world, and my country, a better and safer place," even if that publicized nobility turned out to be a farce coughIraqcough (although I am glad Saddam got to experience what it feels like to die). Unless you're the demigod of a highly programmed autocracy like North Korea, it takes significant buy-in to wage an invasion, war, and occupation. With Greenland being a benign and peace-loving gem of nature, it would absolutely blow my mind if Trump said "CHARGE!" and military members did anything but a limp soulless salute and slow shuffle to mill about stupidly in passive protest.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If the right-wing media start inventing stories about Greenland, Canada and Panama being threats to the USA, I don't trust the US public to see through them. Many will, of course, but then many saw through the Iraq stuff too, just not enough.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hear Greenland has WMDs - in the form of melting glaciers that will cause some kind of climate catastrophe. /s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only solution is to preemptively nuke those glaciers so they can't melt on their own terms.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Genius. If you vaporize them they can't melt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

The magic of thermonuclear thermodynamics!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish Trump would shut TF up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

The worst part about him winning the election is that you can't escape his bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Inb4 Trump starts invading because 2-3 MAGA nuts from Greenland said they wanted to be part of US, so that's plenty of reason for the whole Greenland to need it as well - "they'll see why it's good for them once they're ours, trust me".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Foreign leaders need to stop responding as if a serious response will have any effect. They need to throw that shit back in his face. Tell him you'll accept, only if he discards the shithole states. Then list red states. Or tell him if he can find Greenland on the map, you'll consider it. Or direct the message at blue states and welcoming them if they decide to secede.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

We wish to secede!!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have had it with these muthafuckin calls for muthafuckin annexation

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Well I recall reading about what happened the last time vikings tried to land on American shores, and I say bring em on!

I just need to check my notes real quick.

Okay so it turns out we may have genocided the people who defended their homeland against some of the most feared warfighters of that time, so perhaps trump just drops this whole thing before unnecessary blood is shed.

Seriously, anyone who gets so much as a papercut as a direct result of one of trump's orders is regretful and unfortunate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For national security reasons the world should build a wall around the US.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

...and make Mexico pay for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Obviously, since the US can't even afford eggs.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Trump also undermined Denmark's claim to Greenland, saying it was "very far away and really has nothing to do" with the island.

Well, except, you know ... the whole Nordic/Viking settlements thing?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago

It's only distraction.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›