this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1668 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

13348 readers
2368 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

People who see gender as a F or M binary in 2025 are willingly ignorant to the bone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reading the discussions and some of the disagreements, a correction is needed to be more precise.

Some XX people will be Assigned Male At Birth. Some XY people will be Assigned Female At Birth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“It’s basic biology” mfs when advanced biology

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it is basic biology, ie biology simplified to teach a kid in middle school. the thing is sciences don't stop at middle school level. a lot of university education is about clarifying that things you learned before were simplified to the point that they're practically useless if not outright wrong.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Light travels in straight lines, next year its a wave and then its particles. What you said isso true about uni rethreading.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Tap for spoilerYou don't technically need particles!

Meet me next week for more hot physics takes nobody needed.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To be fair light does travel in straight lines (more or less... ignoring that nothing travels in any set or even single path something something veritasium video), its not lights fault if a straight line in physical reality doesn't always happen to match up with the geometry we invented.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

See I didnt go that far, mindboggling

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Critically thinking now, how strong is the evidence here?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.

But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

Many people with PhD's have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.

A PhD doesn't make you infallible.

I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I'm correct, it's not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it's because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Okay but what is good engagement against "follow the science" aside from "I literally DO the science"? Dr. McCreight offered a point and was met with "nuh uh" so at that point it can hardly be called an argument or debate. Do those fallacies honestly matter at that point when one refuses to engage with tangible points of discussion?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that's why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The phrase is funny but you wouldn't catch me dead wearing a logical fallacy

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can I interest you in a logical phallus?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't that be a logic probe?

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 days ago (5 children)

To be fair, a Person with a PhD still can have Dunning-Kruger on other subjects.

Ben Carson is a great Neurosurgeon, but dumbass on politics.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Neil deGrasse Tyson and literally anything other than astrophysics

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

And sometimes also astrophysics

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

....and all in between, hormonal and/or physically. "Only two genders" is false

[–] [email protected] 165 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Confidently incorrect is the default with these people. I spend most of my time with family aggressively correcting misinformation about my field and related ones. They will die earlier thinking they know more because of Youtube. Getting them to stop taking bad health advice and mystery joint injections from a fucking chiropractor is the latest battle.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 2 days ago (10 children)

The impression of legitimacy enjoyed by chiropractic is too damn high. I was well into my 20s before I ever heard a single word about it being pseudoscience. Walking around (usually on people's fucking spines) calling themselves doctors, I absolutely believed it was just some sub-variety of physiotherapy, which I guess is the point. In the whole universe of alternative medicine, I think that has to be the practice which has most effectively disguised itself as conventional medicine. It's gross.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 130 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

Note how they always enshrine gender in biology, but then make all kinds of non-biological statements about what gender is.

"XX is woman"/"Large gametes is woman"/"can conceive is woman"

And then they'll say

"Women aren't as aggressive", "women are more emotional", "women like being in the home more", "those are women's clothes", etc.

The only reason it's so important for it to be biological is because of how it punishes gender non-conformity and makes the lives of trans people hell. Like it isn't ideologically consistent and they know that. They just don't care. If it was just about genitals or chromosomes, then why is it that gender dictates all these social things about us? The only reason to root gender in how you were born is to ensure gender roles are as rigid and immutable as possible.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 days ago (16 children)

I think a lot of these XX XY "only two genders" people aren't just dunning Kruger, they're transphobic idiots with an agenda. So even if they had the science and knowledge it wouldn't matter because they're pushing their hateful stupid agenda, facts and logic be damned. They don't care, they just want to rationalize hating us trans people because we make them uncomfy.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›