this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
169 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

7164 readers
279 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When people call the current political system a "bourgeois democracy", this is what they mean. The interests of politicians lay with their fellow capitalist oligarchs

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

The interests of politicians lay with their fellow capitalist oligarchs

AlwaysHaveBeen.jpg

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think this problem is specific to Montreal.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Nor to Canada, regards from the UK

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is solvable by outlawing landlords.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really though. 10.8% of homes nationally are unoccupied. Can you imagine how much more accessible housing would be if landlords couldn’t sit on properties to find the next tenant to bleed dry?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a myth. What it actually means is they have no regular occupant, which means for example they're student houses full of students with a home address elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it also be a conflict of interest if they were renters? How can someone not have any interest in housing?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but in that case their interests would be a human right. It's a conflict of interests because they are for profit owners; not just owners.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Why shouldn’t landlords be able to hold public office? Run against them if you’re so much better.