this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1923 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

9857 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As part of his Labor Day message to workers in the United States, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday re-upped his call for the establishment of a 20% cut to the workweek with no loss in pay—an idea he said is "not radical" given the enormous productivity gains over recent decades that have resulted in massive profits for corporations but scraps for employees and the working class.

"It's time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay," Sanders wrote in a Guardian op-ed as he cited a 480% increase in worker productivity since the 40-hour workweek was first established in 1940.

"It's time," he continued, "that working families were able to take advantage of the increased productivity that new technologies provide so that they can enjoy more leisure time, family time, educational and cultural opportunities—and less stress."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While I love this idea and Bernie... There's no fucking way that'll happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can only see this happening hand in hand with Medicare For All and the decoupling of healthcare from full time employment.

Service jobs, which are currently 80 percent of US employment, require the same amount of hours with actual people present, e.g. you can't wait more tables, or answer more customer service calls, in 20% less time.

Removing the cost of healthcare from employers will allow them to allocate some of the savings towards employee salaries instead of healthcare insurance.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Allow them to allocate some of the savings towards employee salaries? Why would they do that when they could pocket the difference like they have been doing to all other cost savings and productivity boosts?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Nobody is saying you should have to do 40 hours work in 32 hours - rather the company hires more people to cover those hours.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›