this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
847 points (99.1% liked)

science

15558 readers
372 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is pretty dumb even by trump standards. You would think the right of all people would know that trying to ban terms will just result in new euphemisms and jargon being created.

Most of the research caught up is probably going to be using the terms incidentally (for instance, a drug study that happens to mention participants were AMAB) and this will cause a bunch of paperwork and probably just end up being changed to something like "gametically" or "chromosomally".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Think even more general than that. Ignore identity/gender/sexuality issues for a moment. How do you write a research article about the negative effects of a drug on pregnancy without using the word pregnant? About complications during a "normal pregnancy"(I'm using their word, not mine - please don't take offense - I hope you see where I'm going)? If you can't mention gender or pregnancy, even when it's about cis people, you suddenly can't do a whole hell of a lot of research.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Oh you can say pregnant woman. Just not pregnant person.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

You would think the right of all people would know that trying to ban terms will just result in new euphemisms and jargon being created.

The right thinks that if they clamp down hard enough that it will just go away, much like LGBTQ people were forced to mask and hide themselves like they had to back in the day, otherwise they ended up like Matthew Shepard. I don't know that they even consider the euphemism treadmill aspect of things, they just don't want these people to feel like they can be themselves and feel safe.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago

Following the manual to the letter

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago

This must be all that government waste I've been hearing about...

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I hope no one resubmits anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How long until this evil administration forces some citizens to sew a yellow star or pink triangle on their clothes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago

I think the endgame is to tear down anything tax dollars have touched. Which, you know, is plausible since his entire platform could be simply summed up as a giant middle finger.

Expect them to attempt to torch more than our science databases

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Truth always is the first victim.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

The GOP read the Bolshevik, CCP and Nazi playbooks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Are you fucking kidding me?!?! What the fuck is wrong with that orange fucking clown? Jesus fuckjng christ.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

times 3.12.23 reporting bb dayorder doubleplussungood refs unpersons rewrite fullwise upsub antefiling

In Oldspeak, this might be rendered:

CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I really hope some people are archiving stuff as fast as possible...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why not move all journals out of the US or move all research out of US journals. Who cares if for instance JAMA publishes nothing this year? Nearly 100% of the value was always in the scientists who write and review the work

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it’s not US journals which are affected, it’s the scientists working for the CDC

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›