this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
457 points (96.9% liked)

196

1174 readers
3733 users here now

This community only has one rule.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

founded 1 day ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There was a 32 minute period from initial text to the first response, and then the whole thing was over by minute 3.

That certainly didn't kill an hour. That's like 35 minutes. Something's not right.

I'd go so far as to say OP is a liar. I bald faced full lipped green eyed strong jawed curly haired liar who broke my heart and will do so again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I noticed that too but I think the meme is constructed by juxtaposing a twitter post making the claim about how much time it would kill onto a text of someone testing the claim on their friend, so the twitter person turns out to be wrong but no fault should be applied to the text convo.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Screenshot of a text convo in the screenshot of a Twitter post in a post on Lemmy- I'm holding you to account reallykindasorta. This rests solely on your broad, muscular shoulders. Quite frankly there's no way to wash your rugged yet tender hands of this mess, and I for one won't stand for it.

They told me the devil would be beautiful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

I certainly perpetuated the myth by sharing it. In that case I’m going to defend it and say that this single text anecdote is an outlier and that, on average, this question would take an hour to resolve (including clarifications about weapons and such).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

lemmy needs this energy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

With or without tools? Tools change the equation big time. The ability of humans (and other monkeys) to throw stuff is probably the closest thing to fucking bullshit sorcery the animal kingdom has ever seen. Even just being able to throw a kinda heavy rock competently can massively level the playing field between a person and a mid-size predator (obviously bears won't give two shits).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I could totally take a T-Rex, and if you don't believe me bring one here and I'll fight it!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

We'll spare no expense!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nah

We have worked with hundreds of sloths over the years, (both wild and human-reared) and they can all inflict serious injuries if scared or irritated. We have seen a sloth bite through a human hand leaving a hole big enough that you could look through.

In addition to their seriously sharp teeth, sloths are astonishingly strong. Due to their specialized muscle structure, their muscles are pound for pound stronger than a human’s. Despite their small size, sloths are 3x stronger than the average person. Meaning that if you are up against an angry sloth who wants to bite you, chances are the sloth will be the winner of that wrestling match.

When they reach independence (at the age of about 18 months), even the most gentle of hand-reared sloths just do not want to be handled any longer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 62 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (5 children)

one of my favourite graphs ever dunno if it's real but eh it's funny

love the difference on geese

personally I'd say rat house cat and medium dog are my definite I'd win not even that difficult maybe maybe the big dog but I dunno the dog could win any of the others are a hard no I'd die

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

Americans are also some of the loudest, over-confident, self-absorbed, entitled people on the planet. Of course they believe they can take on any animal.

My apologies go out to the dozen other Americans who are cool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

I guess Americans just have more experience in actually fighting those overgrown turkeys. Actually turkeys have spurs so they're a bit more of a threat to a human adult than geese are. I'd rather tussle with a goose than a wild Tom turkey.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago

1/3 of British people:

[–] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Have Americans even seen what a goose does?

You’d have a hand around its neck, doing twirls for a shotput throw, and yeah, the goose goes like twenty-five meters back into the lake, and that’s fine.

But with a sinking realization as the goose fucks off, it stole your wallet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There is a family legend about an amorous goose. I don't know it well enough to tell it properly though, I wasn't there when it happened. But I do not understand the Statesian confidence in goose warfare.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Our confidence comes from experience. Canada has been sending their worst at us for generations. We fight geese as children.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

That's the secret. They're all the worst goose.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 52 minutes ago

I meant that in kind of a Trump "they're not sending their best" kind of way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

Call 'em what they are, Cobra Chickens

[–] [email protected] 23 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

The idea that a horse could prepare is kinda whack. What is it gonna do? Get to an open field?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think you could kill a horse in an open field without a long distance weapon. It's a flight animal, if you did any significant damage to it, you'd never come close enough to get it to fight you. Enclosed spaces, that's a different story (you still lose that, it's a horse).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Nah, we min maxed for this already. I mean not me, I'm terrible at running. But I imagine if you go back far enough one of my ancestors was good enough at long distance running that we could eventually chase that horsey down and bang it in the head with a rock when it's all tired out.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago

mine has diamond armor >:3

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I think the more important question is, can a horse prep? Like does it even understand the concept of prepping? I think if you could somehow tell a horse that a week from now it would have to fight a human it probably wouldn't do anything to prepare.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago

Put sharp shoes on, prance around celebrating your imminent death.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

“But the horse gets it too” really sends it for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Not only "what is the horse doing in that time?" but that the dude knows that means no.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Don't think horses can carry HIV. PreP is not necessary

[–] [email protected] 15 points 17 hours ago

Ok Mr. Hands...

[–] [email protected] 26 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Any dude who thinks he can beat a horse is just so wrong. I don't think anything bigger than a bug is possible. I would feel too bad lol

[–] [email protected] 17 points 21 hours ago

Depends what counts as winning. If leaving the arena counts as forfeit then I reckon I could beat a horse cus I don't think a horse has any desire to be there

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If you get prep time surely its easy? What is the horse going to do, I can just make a few spears and set a stick on fire to wave in its face to scare it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine doing it. Stabbing a weapon into the panicking animal while trying to not get kicked. The blood from the wound makes the weapon slippery and hard to hold...

Could you really? You make it sound so easy, like the people who have not taken a life tend to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

I mean a horse is certainly bigger than anything I have had to kill, I will give you that.

But I went with spear because it's typically the weapon of choice against cavalry, it gives you distance reducing the chance you get kicked. You can also place multiple spears around you to protect your location, or make traps and scare it into running into them.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Mom raised abandoned mountain lion cubs. Let's just say I now have no illusions as to my skill fighting an angry possum.

tl;dr: A 90lb. cat with eat your fucking lunch. Even without claws.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I could definitely beat the piss out of a salmon, especially if we were brawling out-of-water. A sheep too. I might get a little hurt, but I think I'd be evenly matched with an angry sheep.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Nah, a sheep would kick my ass. A salmon too probably.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

A horse with arms is much more dangerous. No way I could take it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 22 hours ago

They're called Centaurs you bigoted fuck.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I would say unarmed unprepared combat I could do a coyote. I would be super fucked up but I think I could take one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

See the problem I have with this is that sure, you could take a coyote one-on-one. When is that situation going to happen though? Coyotes typically hunt in duos at minimum. Maybe you're able to get your hands around the first, but you're not going to be able to finish the fight before the second attacks from your blind spot.

A lot of people judge their ability to win in a fight based on their 1v1 matchup, when realistically you should base it on how many you can expect to face at oncem

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

I mean this whole thought experiment is based on hypotheticals in the first place. I never go anywhere completely unarmed and with my knife that I always carry I could absolutely kill many coyotes.

Many people also conceal carry which would probably change the matchup to something much larger like a wild cat. I know handgun calibers generally only serve to piss off large game like bears and moose so it would probably top out somewhere around a mountain lion if we are allowing what some of us normally daily carry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Their bites aren't as bad as you might think. They can fuck you up, but they rely on pretty quick attacks, so the risk is more in repeated strikes(from what we've seen with the limited coyote attacks that happen).

Don't recommend going for a straight-on brawl, but if you can get behind one, you might have a chance. Bonus points, they're naturally pretty disinclined to fight a human unless given no other options, so you might be able to slip behind at a point?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

I think for me the line is somewhere between big dog and wolf lmao

load more comments
view more: next ›