this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19226 readers
373 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1
What Do Democrats Need to Do? Act Like an Opposition Party. (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 15 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

That's literally all they've been doing since Reagan.

acting like an opposition party.

It took way too long, but that's why you can't drum up the numbers anymore, all but the thickest of skulls have finally realized that Democrat and Republican are both just big corpo, bickering over the social issue symptoms of our rigged economy and society as they maintain the economy and it's perverse incentives as it is, on the same take by the same oligarchs.

At least Republicans throw their horrible voters a bone, "Oh you hate the other? we'll be cruel to them to entertain you and tickle your schaudenfreude fancy!"

Democrats get nothing for their troubles. We're told it's our duty.

Meanwhile, killing your own non wealthy customers for moar profit? R👍D👌

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

I'm reluctantly happy that people are starting to see that wedge issues are crafted by corporations and parroted by business bought representative to pit man against man who can barely buy bread to the point where e pluribus unum was meaningless there decades ago. Greed has no party affiliation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago

Pass laws to limit election spending/fund raising so that the playing field is about as even as we can manage. After those are set in stone and strong, dismantle the national committees and open the actual gates to allow whoever to run for office.

Even doing this wouldn't change much though. The popularity contest not at all based on policy would still reign supreme and American voters are still American voters.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago

we are passed the ballot box.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

No, they need to be an opposition party for the first fucking time in decades.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

What I've learned from the last two presidential elections is that right now, the incumbent party loses if people are unhappy with the current state of the country. A clever, but evil opposition party would try to make things worse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

This is why "doing what republiQans do" isn't a useful tactic for Democrats. Never has been, though the party leaders have never learned it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

They'll come up with a nifty hashtag like #resist or #democracy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

The key work here is "act'' like an actor.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

And they won’t.

The Democratic Party is frankly played out at this point. It’s pretty obviously a zombie party. We need a new one that isn’t beholden to neoliberalism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Please keep that attitude in 2028, when every mention of voting third party gets you called a Nazi and "a vote for 3P is a vote for Trump!!"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

When there's a viable third party candidate, sure.

Otherwise - yes, it is a vote against your own interests. Hi, I'm one of those who pointed out its just a vote for trump in this past election. It was true then, its still true now. You don't start during the presidential election season, or you're just a grifter.

You push for 3rd party in local and state elections and get viable candidates.

Jill Stein is still nothing more than a piece of trash grifter.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

You don't start during the presidential election season, or you're just a grifter.

Jill Stein is too busy having lunch with Putin to join the conversation.

Edit: you already called her out. I should read the whole comment before having a kneejerk reaction.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

Different scenario. The hard work of getting a new party or new candidates into the process needs to be done right now. If you don't see any fruits of that hard work come election day then you need to go with the stop-gap option.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago

Failing to account for the constraints of the system you’re participating in is a recipe for failing to succeed in said system.

I’m not saying I like the DNC - in fact, I have come to outright detest the party as a whole. But there’s a reason why all the younger progressive legislators are still in the Democratic Party, and that’s tactical political pragmatism. That said, I do think the results of this election, and this continuing ratfucking by the DNC oligarchs is going to be seen as the breaking point in history books (if we eventually pull out of this authoritarian slide and have history books in the future, that is).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago

Well, it is, statistically. The voting system makes sure of that. We need a better system before we can vote for the best, not the one who is most likely to beat the worst.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Although i was already leaning this way but Geriatric Nancy Pelosi pushing the vote against AOC from the hospital from her broken hip made me decide I won't be voting Democrat in the national elections any time soon.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

No - that’s the wrong response. You’ve got to be tactical. You can’t ignore the constraints of the system if you’re going to participate in the system. Doing so is a recipe for failure.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

As opposed to the resounding success that we just saw.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I kinda stopped caring, been voting tactically the last three elections and still got orange mussolini and an our incumbent senator got beat by an out of state republican. And the democratic party is not adjusting, instead its doubling down. Why should I reward this kind of behavior. Local elections and state elections I'll still keep supporting who I think is best

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Why should I reward this kind of behavior.

That's not how it works -you "reward" the behavior of candidates who vote the way you want and if there are none, you vote for the least damaging while encouraging those who do vote the way you want to run.

It's not a boycott. If the party (any party, not just DNC) is broken - fix the party. The DNC has been broken for longer than not, but if you can think of anything good that's happened in government, it's almost always because of Democrats. That doesn't happen by non-involvement, that's not the fix.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

That’s not how it works -you “reward” the behavior of candidates who vote the way you want

Easy for you to say. You have candidates who vote the way you want.

If the party (any party, not just DNC) is broken - fix the party.

By what mechanism? If the party loses nothing when it ignores its constituents, there's no leverage.

That doesn’t happen by non-involvement, that’s not the fix.

Involvement hasn't worked either. But now you get to blame the party acting like you want it to on people who are upset that it doesn't work for them. It's simple, if the party doesn't work for you, it's because you're not involved enough! So really it's your fault that the party is run by corrupt pro-genocide geriatrics who render primaries meaningless. Lazy millennials.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, sorry "the least damaging candidates" are not even getting elected because of the actions of the DNC. I would argue that it was the DNC that in large part created this mess were in right now. I'm pretty much tuned out of this system until somebody comes along that I believe is worth supporting and it's not some neoliberal puppet spitting on our faces.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

FWIW, I too share that deep sense of ennui. It’s genuinely hard not to feel that way at this point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. I'll vote for the kind of politician I want in the primary, and vote tactically for the one who is closest to my views, but who stands something of a chance of winning in the general.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

It's a good thing that primaries are fair and exist consistently.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

both sides are bought and paid for with the same checks

only thing that could be done is to start over

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

Seriously. If you haven't switched your party affiliation to Independent, how's the time to do it. It'll take a pretty big hit to their register to actually get the lames in D.C. to care about us again

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Both sides do raise money to operate, but the people funding the two parties are, to a very large extent, different.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Michael Fucking Bloomberg is the top individual Democrat contributor in 2024.

A billionaire is a billionaire is a billionaire. When people say they are funded by the same people, we mean they're funded by the same class interests. Individual small donations from the working class are a literal drop in the bucket compared to what the wealthy contribute.

The Democrats are still funded by the same set of class interests as the Republicans: the wealthy.

If the majority of your funding comes from people who like low taxes for the rich, don't like programs to help the poor, and who generally just want to benefit the already-wealthy, then you're going to really fucking struggle to represent interests of the working class, because the people funding you will stop funding you when you stop focusing on their problems.

Michael Bloomberg in my eyes is not materially different from Elon Musk. But sure, somehow the people funding the party are "different." We didn't just watch Pelosi squash AOCs committee for her wealthy donors, who don't like AOC or what she's selling. Give me a break.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I'll acknowledge that this chart is a little old

Corporate America:

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Google/Alphabet didn't make that list?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 13 hours ago

Probably not then. Maybe now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 22 minutes ago

They dont need to "act like" it, they need to actually be it.