this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19226 readers
356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

What's next? Pravda TV brought to you by the MAGAts and Vlad.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Tired of casting votes.

Cast a brick.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Alt: 'you don't need to be a wizard to cast fireball' text with a Moltov cocktail picture

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago

Making me remember the "throw a brick" lyric from Every Time I Die's last album

This is an extremely specific reference, but Lemmy is an extremely specific place, so who knows.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

the constitution will save us

Says the people whose constitution didn't stop a traitor from becoming president

[–] [email protected] 0 points 20 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morse_v._Frederick

It's amazing the latitude "the Constitution" will allow under a Strict Constructionist interpretation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Turns out the constitution is just a piece of paper.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

More of what you'll call guidelines, rather than rules

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Bet, pirate meshed SDR broadcasts it is. Evil can be powerful, but never endures.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought these people were all "free speech absolutists"?

Or does that only apply when companies are trying to pump the brakes on spreading Kremlin agitprop to divide this country and hand it to the likes of Putin's puppet, donvict?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago

Donvict. I like that and am going to steal it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But there was ketchup on the wall at that meeting…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Is the First Amendment going to grab Pig Boy by the lapel and punch him in hte face? Because last I checked, there are no self-enforcing laws made by humans. Laws of physics, yeah, but they're descriptive rather than prescriptive so aren't really the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I love the way people think the Constitution matters any more.

The constitution is a piece of paper. Laws set and rights granted by the Constitution require people to actually enforce and uphold them. If there is nobody willing or able to enforce and uphold them, then it carries about as much weight and gravity as a mattress tag.

If Trump says he wants to revoke your broadcast license, and the FCC says it's going to revoke your broadcast license, and the Trump-friendly Supreme Court says they can revoke your broadcast license, then you don't have a broadcast license. Full stop. Sure, you can say you have 1st amendment protections, but if the people tasked with upholding those protections are falling in line behind Trump (spoiler alert: They are), then you might as well be preaching about your 1st amendment protections to pigeons in the park for all the good that's going to do for you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

If the lawsuit is shit you must aquit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if the court says they can't revoke, the court has no power to stop them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure they do. Once revoked they can keep broadcasting. They get fined... they take that to court. If the court doesn't uphold the fine, they don't have to pay it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

Even when you're totally innocent it costs money to fight a claim or indictment. I have a strong suspicion there will be a record level of government spending on lawsuits in the next 4 years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Going the next step, FCC licenses only have as their paper. If people want to broadcast, the only thing stopping them will be their own grit against whatever the gov't wants to throw at them, be it a few lawyers or SWAT teams.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It won't. He owns the SCOTUS. They will twist president in knots to justify whatever they want.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Guessing you got “precedent” autocorrected.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Its so funny the way he accuses everyone of going after him personally with witch hunts and all and the way republicans talk about choosing winners and losers. Projection really defines this party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yep. The minute the qons started up with the qanon narratives, I was pretty sure prominent members of the qons are trafficking kids. I'm also not entirely certain that they are not trying to utilize adrenochrome somehow....

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

He does it so he thinks everybody does.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

As always it's projection. Trump is a witch hunter.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because it works.

Think of when you were a kid. When you and your siblings got into a fight and ran to mommy, who won? Whatever kid got to mommy first. Mommy really didn't care about the story itself. Whoever got there first won, and the rest were told "stop annoying your brother." And then when they do exactly what you just got in trouble for, mommy just said not to make up stories and accuse your brother of doing what you just got in trouble for. Any attempt at defending yourself was often met with "I said enough! Now go to your room before you get grounded."

Same thing applies here. Trump has mastered the political equivalent of running to mommy (the public) first. Trump has mastered the art of accusing everybody else of doing what he either is doing or intends to do, knowing full well that any attempts at holding him accountable will look like petty sour grapes. And the rest of the party have been taking notes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

When you and your siblings got into a fight and ran to mommy, who won?

I did. I had the longest memory and was the meanest son of a bitch in the family.

Trump's a whiner and a liar. But he wouldn't stand a chance against an organized and committed mass opposition. And anyone who cares how that might look to the average Fox viewer isn't committed.

load more comments
view more: next ›