Why would anyone vote against it?
Maybe it was written by the same person who wrote the title of this Post? Lol
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
85 points (94.7% liked)
News
23387 readers
2045 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Work in the trades. You’ll see a fuck ton of people who are against minimum wage going up.
I work in the trades, in a deeply red state.
There are a few against it but for the most part people I work with support a minimum wage raise.
I work with some shitty people but don't put that evil on us.
I'm sure they say a lot of things, but when it comes down to it, they likely vote for people who are fighting against raising the minimum wage. And if it came down to a ballot initiative, they would vote against it.
Why?
It increases the cost of living for everything else.
Yes, I know that the cost of living is going up regardless, but that is their answer.
That sounds a lot like "I make more than them and if they get a raise I won't". The cost of living has nothing to do with that lol
Yes, that’s exactly what it is
But thst doesn't happen when they have raised the minimum wage in other places. Why do they think that?
Propaganda from the ruling class.
Yes
this has been disproven time and time again and is just propaganda you are parroting.
... Why?
It’s half the low that cost of living is tied to it, and half that they don’t want people who work “less hard” to make as much money as they do.
Because "back in my day" isn't just Grandpa rambling. It's also adults who resent their upbringing but are stupid enough to pass it on. First to their kids, and now to wage earners.
Also people can be tricked by propaganda and lies pretty easily.
That's often the reason. We had some bullshit in my State during the election. It was worded in a way that despite being someone who enjoys doing the writing, I still felt like I had to look it up.
Kaepora Gaebora can kiss my shiny metal ass, dammit.
It was a really bad year for California props, people just took a hard right turn.
No to: raise the minimum wage, provide housing, abolish slavery
Yes to: harsher sentencing and some weird vendetta a rich guy has against an AIDS nonprofit
Motherfuckers complain about homeless population nonstop and then refuse to pass anything to fix it.
It was in fact very badly written, with stuff like wage changes taking effect "immediately" (in practice 5 days after vote counts are certified).
Is there a place for posting titles that say the opposite of what they mean? Like the "Don't Dead, Open Inside". That comma ruins it. I can only assume they edited some words out of the one line without reading the result.
What a poorly written headline (not by OP). It makes it sound like rejecting the proposition will raise minimum wage by $2, when that's what the proposition would have done. Technically correct, using the less-common usage of a comma to include a second subject. But if that's not intentional and malicious, ABC News has a terrible editor...