this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
77 points (84.7% liked)

datahoarder

6777 readers
2 users here now

Who are we?

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

We are one. We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.

-- 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reposted from lemmy.world c/politics since it violated it's rule #1 about links.

Now that the fascists have taken over, what books, academic studies, and pieces of knowledge should take priority in personal/private archival? I'm thinking about what happened in Nazi Germany, especially with the burning of the Institute for Sexual Science(Institut für Sexualwissenschaft) and what was lost completely in the burnings.

Some of us should consider saving stuff digitally or physically.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"The fascists have taken over" yet were the non-fascists that decided to cut episodes and scenes from old tv shows and movies because they were offensive thus destroying culture in the process. Interesting.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Considering the precedents in the US, any books about gender, sex and history.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Any specific ones in mind that are of great importance or influence?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

seconding a focus on sexology; we don't need another Institut für Sexualwissenschaft incident.

off the top of my head:

  • The History of Sexuality (Michel Foucault 1976 – 84 + 2018)
  • Transgender Warriors (Leslie Feinberg 1998)
  • Gender Trouble (Judith Butler 1990)
  • Undoing Gender (Judith Butler 2004)
  • Caliban and the Witch (Silvia Federici 2004)
  • Black on Both Sides (C. Riley Snorton 2017)
  • The Stonewall Riots (Marc Stein 2019)

 

including all the works of Judith Butler and Silvia Federici.

more academically:

  • Kinsey Reports; The Kinsey Institute: The First Seventy Years; and any other expansions on the work of the Kinsey Institute
  • Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Healthcare: A Clinical Guide to Preventive, Primary, and Specialist Care (Kristen Eckstrand, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld 2016)

 

you can probably farm the bibilographies on these.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Considering the precedents set in Nazi Germany... same exact things.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago

I would suggest medical texts, survival and military field manuals. I don't think they will be needed but it might be best to be prepared. As for culture, stash what you like.

On second thought, the medical texts would be useful either way. https://www.alreporter.com/2024/10/31/analysis-rural-hospitals-closure-crisis-alabamas-healthcare-safety-net-at-risk/ Hospitals closing have been happening for a while.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really hope archive.org has a backup of itself somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I remember reading somewhere that there are copies of bits of archive.org distributed across the globe, but the majority of it is in US data centres. It’s incredibly big, though, so it’s hard to just take a copy of it and move it somewhere else.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

I get the sentiment, but in this time and age and with the internet, I think the information most likely to be at risk of being destroyed or censored is the one that is not commonly available, or in the hands of law enforcement.

A fascist government will more likely effectively prevent creation of new dissenting works, than suppressing existing ones.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is ludicrously alarmist. I mean, archive whatever you want (it's good practice to back up things you think are important), but the United States is hardly a fascist dictatorship anymore than it was in 2017 (or 2021 or 2013...). The opposing party wins sometimes, and it hasn't ended the republic yet. Federal funding might be cut to new gender research, but nobody's going to go around to universities, confiscating copies of existing studies to be burned.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

What checks and balances might be eroded today compared to 2017?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

All the instances where the Dems were doing the exact same shit so they can't pretend they are the solution

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)