this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
213 points (83.8% liked)

Political Memes

5391 readers
3233 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 minutes ago

Even for tiny, tiny social media platforms like the fediverse, the current propaganda/misinformation campaign is tailor-made for the expected audience.
E.g., on Facebook it might be enough to post AI slop depicting Trump as a saint. Here, that won't fly. You have to understand that a lot of lefties and educated people reside here, so you just have to point the undecided to a third party. Maybe you're not even after the actual undecided, spreading FUD is usually good enough. And a healthy dose of "both sides"!

Of course, it's vital to omit the fact that FPTP systems always devolve into two-party systems (a fact well understood), and you're good to go. Easy rubles probably.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Only in a broken democracy...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 minutes ago

Yes. That's what we are stuck with at the moment, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 40 minutes ago

Either you play the have you're dealt or you don't complain when you forfeit the game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 27 minutes ago

Voting 3rd party for progressivism is the biggest self own in history. And repeatedly too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

These morons at the bar were talking about how they plan to vote 3rd party to "show them" they're sick of two party.

We're all sick of two party but voting 3rd party right now doesn't magically fix it. And in this particular election it could possibly mean you never get to vote again.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

We need ranked choice voting, so you can vote for who you actually support without throwing your vote away.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Ever since reading about some strange properties of RCV -- which ended up being displayed in Alaska's first election using it and caused it to be repealed in Vermont -- I've been a bit suspect of it. Systems such as STAR voting and approval voting seem better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago) (1 children)

That's not strange, that's how it works. Especially if there's a strong 'anyone but Palin' contingent.

Star and approval look fucking terrible and is way out of line of the 'one person one vote' system we have and I think we want.

*For anyone wondering about Alaska, there were two Republicans, including Palin, and one Democrat running for house seat. The other Republican was eliminated in ranked choice. Essentially his votes split to both the Dem and Palin, instead of all going to Palin like the Palin people wanted, and the Democrat won. So the GOP there is now mad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

The GOP was maybe mad, but more importantly to me the people who actually study voting systems for a living were "mad".

Ignoring that the outcome was maybe what I would have wanted, it is definitely pathological that you can hurt a candidate by voting for them. Quoting the Wikipedia:

The election was also a negative voting weight event, where a voter's ballot has the opposite of its intended effect (e.g. a candidate being disqualified for having "too many votes"). In this race, Begich lost as a result of 5,200 ballots ranking him ahead of Peltola; Peltola also would have lost if she had received more support from Palin voters.

What do you find wrong with those other systems? RCV is also not "one person one vote". Approval voting is used in the UN and neither seem to have some of the pathologies of RCV.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Which will never happen because the Republicans are dead set on never changing any system in any way that's not directly in their benefit and no one else's. Until that moment arrives, which is never, the only option is to pick your particular flavour of straight-up fascism (Republicans these days) or anything else (Democrats) in the party primaries.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

One of the few advantages of our splintered system of states is that voting is done on a state level. We can implement ranked-choice voting in states where Republicans are weak, and in doing so, allow states that aren't filled with fascists to choose between multiple non-fascist ideologies, instead of just fascists and 'whoever is left'.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Don't fool yourself. The DNC also doesn't want ranked choice voting. Neither party wants any competition. The entire system is built to make it virtually impossible for a third party candidate to win. Unless they actually hit 270+, even if they were a clear majority winner, they wouldn't be elected.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I will be voting for Kamala, because I do think it's very important that Trump not get reelected. I hope she wins, but her winning alone will not be enough. We need to do a better job of figuring out why America is in the state that it is in, so that we can come up with ways to fix it (assuming it can be fixed).

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely. Voting is incredibly important, but on its own, it just buys time. Without time, we can do nothing - but if we are determined to do nothing, all the time in the world won't save us.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Well, the absolute freedom of speech might be a thing to look at, as blatant lying and fascist rhetoric are not countered by more speech. Especially not if money = speech. As this gives the robber barons unfair advantage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

In a democracy, you only get a voice if you vote. Voting IS the protest. When you don't vote, or spoil your vote, you abdicate your voice.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

In the current situation you could try to pretend that your vote is useful by not voting or voting third parties. But that it is not the reality of the consequences.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Wrong. One is exactly twice as bad as the other.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

One is way better than the other if you're a Trump supporter!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

Mathematically, it's still exactly one half as bad as bad to not vote than to vote for the Republican party, regardless of who you are. A vote Republican swings the count 2 points relative to voting Democrat. No vote, 1 point relative to voting Democrat.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago

Technically, there can be a difference, but only if you are a Trump supporter

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

Blanket statements don't work. How each state allocates votes to electoral college votes varies, and each states political leaning varies.

There are times when not voting or voting third party effectively has no effect or the opposite effect.

These oversimplified takes are tiring and pathetic.

Get better arguments.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago

Ideally just get proportional representation with something like ranked choice voting and make it possible for 3rd party votes to count for something.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

Explain how voting third party could have the "opposite effect". Opposite of what?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Oh my God an image macro posted to the political memes board doesn't have 60 pages of nuanced footnotes explaining how if you're in Nebraska then your voting system works differently I'm going to literally shit my own pants out of rage