this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
305 points (91.8% liked)

Today I Learned

17773 readers
428 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The planet will be here for a long, long, long time after we’re gone and it will heal itself, it will cleanse itself ’cause that’s what it does. It’s a self-correcting system. The air and the water will recover, the earth will be renewed, and if it’s true that plastic is not degradable, well, the planet will simply incorporate plastic into a new paradigm: the Earth plus Plastic. The Earth doesn’t share our prejudice towards plastic. Plastic came out of the Earth; the Earth probably sees plastic as just another one of its children. Could be the only reason the Earth allowed us to be spawned from it in the first place: it wanted plastic for itself, didn’t know how to make it, needed us. Could be the answer to our age-old philosophical question: “Why are we here?” Plastic, assholes!

-- George Carlin

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How old is that? I've been looking for one for years. I think that's it, but I don't remember the last panel like that

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Gosh, I wanna say I saw it at least as far back as 2010, possibly older.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One of my biggest regrets in life was passing on an opportunity to see him perform. A friend had some tickets and invited me, but I wasn't able to get the day off work. "I'll catch him when he tours again next year", I thought. He died later that year.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I saw him in Marquette, Michigan in the early 90s. The only thing I remember about the performance was "don't call Natives 'Native Americans'. America sucks. Just call them Indians."

Marquette's pretty much the backwater of Michigan, he must have been working on new material.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I saw him, but he clearly had a cold so he was really off his game. It was still funny, but I wish I could have seen him when he wasn't feeling like crap.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

So many of us do, but if he was alive in 2016, Trump winning would have killed him.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Earth, is in fact, Earth/Plastic, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Earth plus Plastic. Earth is not a planet unto itself, but rather another component of a fully self-correcting paradigm made useful by Plastic and it's human manufacturers, compromising a full ecosystem defined by Mother Nature.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Pay to read the rest, and no sources linked as far as I can find. They are using a proxy to figure out the weight without bothering to eliminate a bunch of variables either.

Nano and micro plastics are a thing, and it's bad. Just like this article

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have one installed, but if I'm sharing, I copy the URL and go to https://achive.today and see if they have it. If they don't, I ask them to archive it then share it.

Here is a link if you (or anyone else) is interested: https://archive.is/BW4Tp

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yoink, I will be using that

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Til that OP has no concept of what a particle is or how small it is or how many of them there are in any given scenario because our brains did not evolve to process that kind of scale accurately.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just posted the article. Why not be constructive and post something more informative?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Because pop science articles often throw out bullshit like "blowing your nose can cause you to expel over 100 germs" because they know that 100 sounds like a big number and will get clicks.

People not questioning the actual context and meaning behind those numbers and how they connect back to something we actually care about leads to a lot of bullshit science reporting.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That seems more like your problem than OP's.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lmao, bruh here thinks his brain evolved to process scales of millions and comprehend a nanometer.

Are you a special unique bro different from everyone else?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's 14,000 to 75,000, not millions.

Microplastics are in the range of one micrometer to five millimeters, not nanometers.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That changes literally nothing of what I said. Your brain did not evolve to process those scales accurately. If you think you can, that just means you're lacking in self reflection.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Being factually incorrect about literally everything you said changes nothing? Okay.

More importantly, humans are capable of abstract thought. Your whole argument is specious. If you find yourself lacking the context to understand these numbers, you can easily seek context. A good starting place would be the actual paper, which is linked in OP's article. For the lazy: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61146-4

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Being factually incorrect about literally everything you said changes nothing? Okay.

Yeah bruh, it's this little thing called being pedantic.

If I say wealth inequality is crazy, no one should have 250 billion dollars, and you say 'well actually Jeff Bezos only has 210 billion dollars', then I will be factually incorrect and my point will still be completely valid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you really just compare the difference between 210 billion and 250 billion to the difference between 14,000 to 75,000 vs millions and one micrometer to five millimeters vs nanometers?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, it's this little thing called context, thresholds, and relative magnitude.

If your brain is only evolved to process numbers up to a hundred or two, then everything 10000+ is similarly processed through abstractions rather than your brain being able to directly comprehend and compare them.

If instead of asking a guffawing question, you actually tried to point out why my reasoning was flawed, you may have realized those basic aspects of how language and reasoning work on your own.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Relative magnitude, really? You’re undermining your own point by not using a representative example and then calling your example a relative magnitude to the others.

210 billion to 250 billion = ~19% increase

75,000 to a million = ~12,000% increase

Nanometer to micrometer = ~99,000% increase

Nanometer to 5 millimeters = ~499,999,900% increase

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Notice how all of those numbers are substantially larger or smaller, by many orders of magnitude, than a couple of hundred.

Are you intentionally trying to avoid understanding what I'm writing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

210 billion is not substantially smaller than 250 billion. Are you intentionally trying to miss the point?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Damn, how have I not heard of this before? I always thought it got dumped into landfills and eventually degraded to tiny particles. If it's released so directly, it feels a lot more viable to reduce exposure by avoiding plastics...

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That's the thing, when people hear the term micro they still (for some reason) assume its something they can see with their naked eyes. Kind of like those plastic pellets put into handsoaps a while back that are now band.

In reality microplastics are everywhere there is plastic, and they are released all the time at a microscopic level. Meaning you actually need a microscope to see them. Its like a fine dust.

Now think of all the plastic items you use and come in contact with.

Toothbrushes for example, each time you brush your teeth the brisels break down at a microscopic level and are released. The plastic utensils you use either in the kitchen on your pans, or the single use ones for food, they all slowly release plastics. That plastic cutting board, or boiling water in a plastic kettle, yup they all also release plastic.

Pretty much everything breaks down at a microscopic level, that is how knives become dull, or how items show wear and tear over time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

for some reason

it's probably because the limit for the category of microplastics is "now widely defined as pieces ≤5 mm in size".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

It's insane to me that people actually have plastic kettles.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Food in plastic containers seems really bad for you, and microwaving food in plastic seems worse.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Go [email protected] ! Stop buying plastic bottle when you want water.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thanks for linking that community.

On top of you advice: IMO if the tap water is safe for drinking, use that and don't buy bottled water at all. No need to add to the plastic problem. Also: it's usually cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

deleted by creator