God fucking dammit we really have to start predicting whatever almost-plausible-with-AI bullshit the far right is going to try to take advantage of while possible
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19134 readers
3696 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Radio Free Europe? The National Enquirer is more reputable than this CIA propaganda
Conservatives are deadly-level stupid.
Conservatives hate science, oppose education, ban healthcare, burn books, oppress vulnerable people and believe absolutely anything that makes them angry. Their gullibility and narcissism makes them a national security nightmare.
Conservatism has always been the culmination of humanity's worst traits. If conservatives are not forcibly regulated, they will oppress or kill every innocent person on earth.
The paradox of tolerance
You have it all wrong. Conservatives don’t hate or dislike these things. They just dislike it when the people they hate have these things.
If you’re poor or brown you are exactly the type of person conservatives hate and they want to take everything away from you so you suffer.
These are the types of people that want to bring slavery back.
Human suffering is their hobby.
Why would anyone be stupid enough to take video of themselves destroying ballots?
What? To go home and show your friends? To beat off to?
Anyone who actually buys this shit (Trump, MAGAs) is brain-dead.
I mean, I get why the video was made, to give Trump more reason to bitch when he loses, but it never continues to frighten me that there are people out there who will take this as something that really took place.
Radio free Europe is CIA propaganda. I wish you would use a better source for this. This one appears to be true but I just do not like or trust this source at all.
Well I came to complain about the same thing, sort of. Just - why is this not all over corporate news since trumps plan is twofold; win the election or steal the election. russia is once again behind both.
You can’t gain any useful or truthful information about foreign powers or election interference from the CIA. Their whole goal is literally propaganda to make Americans mistrust or hate other countries.
well I see the Guardian US picked it up. Maybe it'll make the rounds yet.
I wanted to actually see the video, dang it.
A few seconds into this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHbCkOMH1T0
The envelopes have a too dark shade of green, are too glossy and have no return address the FBI says.
Thanks. I had no doubts the video was a fake, but I was definitely curious to see it.
Can somebody share the video?
Yeah I went looking for the videos well and all I got was links that redirected back to the same website. Which is angering.
A few seconds into this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHbCkOMH1T0
The envelopes have a too dark shade of green, are too glossy and have no return address the FBI says.
Thanks a bunch!
This is who will determine the next president:
I recall they uncovered a Chinese fake because it was printed on A4 (?) paper size instead of 8.5x11.
They must have found all the bamboo in the paper.
Ugg, they are clearly printed on an ink jet.
Just another day at the office…
Sigh.
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty:
Wiki: mixed - Additional considerations apply to the use of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). RFE/RL should be used cautiously, if at all, for reporting published from the 1950s to the early 1970s, when RFE/RL had a documented relationship with the CIA. RFE/RL may be biased in some subject areas (particularly through omission of relevant, countervailing facts), and in those areas, it should be attributed in the article body. There is no consensus as to what subject areas require attribution. The scope of topics requiring attribution of RFE/RL should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-trump-harris-election-fake-video/33174319.html