this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
100 points (96.3% liked)

World News

38896 readers
2501 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that it was Russia's business whether or not it decided to use North Korean troops and said that if Ukraine wanted to join NATO then Moscow could do what it wanted to ensure its own security.

The United States said on Wednesday that it had seen evidence that North Korea has sent 3,000 troops to Russia for possible deployment in Ukraine, a move that the West is casting as a significant escalation of the Ukraine war.

Ukraine's military intelligence service said that the first North Korean units trained in Russia had been deployed in the Kursk region, a Russian border area where Ukrainian forces took a chunk of Russian land in August.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

By that logic, it sounds like it’s Ukraine’s affair whether or not it allows NATO armored brigades and CAP to operate in the Ukrainian theater, in concert with AFU forces.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 17 hours ago

To be fair, that is probably up to Ukraine. Except that we aren’t offering those NATO brigades. I wish we would.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 19 hours ago

Can you imagine being a Putin supporter and simping for such a dumb and cowardly piece of shit?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

if Ukraine wanted to join NATO then Moscow could do what it wanted to ensure its own security

NATO should really just allow Ukraine to join and tell Russia: get out within 1 week and restore the original borders or you're at war with NATO. It's Ukraine' and NATO's affair after all, correct?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That’s probably why NATO doesn’t invite countries at war. What’s stopping Ukraine from invoking article 5 immediately?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well, that'd be the point of Ukraine joining NATO currently.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

NATO maintains that it is a defensive alliance. If NATO starts adding countries Russia is currently at war with, it becomes an offensive alliance.

That being said, why wasn’t Ukraine added earlier?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

NATO maintains that it is a defensive alliance. If NATO starts adding countries Russia is currently at war with, it becomes an offensive alliance.

I don't think so. Ukraine is in a defensive war. Actively joining their side doesn't turn it into an offensive one. The difference between offensive and defensive conflicts is the goal: In an offensive, you want to gain something. In a defence, it is about keeping what you have. Just because NATO would come to their aid, Ukraine wouldn't want to conquer Russia.

That being said, why wasn’t Ukraine added earlier?

Multiple reasons probably:

  • Ukraine was and to some extent still is a post-soviet state: Oligarchs, corruption and all that comes with it.
  • There was the Budapest Memorandum in place which guaranteed a sovereign Ukrainian state affectively as buffer between Russia and other NATO countries. Which was subsequently broken by Russia in 2014.
  • "Don't anger the Russians". See where this got us?
[–] [email protected] 1 points 35 minutes ago

Man, to drop decorum, I don’t give a shit about the Russians and angering them. I’m just trying not to give Russia a pretext to do something really fucking stupid. Yes, they can perform false flag operations for their own pretext.

Joining an active war without a prior alliance is an escalation. To keep NATO defensive and not to bring them into an active war, there should be a different agreement signed.

Hell, NK joining the war is an escalation by both NK and Russia. Does this justify NATO adding Ukraine just for them to immediately invoke article 5? I don’t think so.

Regardless of ethics and politicking though, someone HAS to be done to show Russia that it can’t just arbitrarily annex parts of other countries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Russia can stop being at war at any second, if it chooses to

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

Right, but if chooses too Ukraine will likely join NATO and Russia ends up with another NATO country against its land border.

The only reason they would withdraw is if they don’t have enough troops - which they are supplementing with North Korean troops. It’s against Russia’s geopolitical interest.

That and Putin is a crazy guy doing crazy things. Putin may not stop even if it IS in his best interests to do so

[–] [email protected] 20 points 19 hours ago

I'm pretty sure war is not a one-sided situation, Vlad.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 19 hours ago