this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
288 points (97.1% liked)

Comics

5854 readers
30 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Tragedy of the commons, but the humans are the cattle.

For each employer, it's most profitable to work your slaves to the bone, even if it's better for every employer to collectively treat their employees well

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

The only difference as compared with the old, outspoken slavery is this, that the worker of today seems to be free because he is not sold once for all, but piecemeal by the day, the week, the year, and because no one owner sells him to another, but he is forced to sell himself in this way instead, being the slave of no particular person, but of the whole property-holding class.

Friedrich Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England (1845)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

People who thrive are on better footing to fight back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

This is good because tragedy of the commons only applies to capitalists. Historically, normal people were capable of using the commons responsibly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I agree with the sentiment here, but doesn't birthrate decline correlate with increased income? National birthrates always fall as a country's per capita income rises.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, but actually no. AFAIK, it decreases when infant & childhood mortality decrease or when Quality Of Life (QOL) decreases.

Post-Soviet Europe that was given shock therapy by neocolonialists had decreased QOL and decreased birthrates, and increased deaths of despair. Now that neoliberalism has reached more advanced stages back here in the imperial core, our QOL and birthrates are also decreasing, and our deaths of despair are rising. 'Deaths Of Despair' Examines The Steady Erosion Of U.S. Working-Class Life

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, they say that, but if you poll Americans of birthing age, most say they want more kids but can't afford it. Also, on paper I make more than my dad did, even including inflation, but I couldn't get within a MILE of providing two kids with the lifestyle he did on what I make, so... IS income really increasing in these places?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

They're lying to us about inflation. It's bigger than the authorities will admit. Lots bigger.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Hot take: birthrate is high when it's economically profitable to have kids - helping hands all around to take care of stuff. When they're a financial burden for the rest of your life besides substantially worsening your quality of life, birthrate plummets.