this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19141 readers
2263 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Accuse your enemies of that which you are guilty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (10 children)

To be brief, it’s propaganda designed to keep rural voters red. Ie- "those big city folk don’t care about you."

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Putin is also one of the world's richest man and funds Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Because it's convenient to have bad faith actors sowing discord before any election.

Tankies (sleeper conservatives that they are) can't rely on logic, merit or hope for a better tomorrow, so they cause as much chaos as possible to their perceived 'enemies'. This chaos includes the encouragement of unrealistic statements and general cognitive dissonance.

My true thoughts are that they went too far and started to believe their own drivel as generations of hexbears rose and fell and shit themselves into .ml

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

To Democrats, "elites" mean your in some top percentile of wealth and income. To Republicans, "elites" means having a college degree.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It means the nerds you shoved in lockers who learned to read and now have successful lives while you scrape by trying to make alimony at a job that would pay a living wage if you didn't live in a right to work state.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not what (((elites))) mean to Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

A lot of times they amp up the dog whistle and say (((global elites))).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So they basically turned anti elitism to anti intellectualism so they can fool their audience.

I mean, I thought we all knew that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I wonder what kind of people ran on anti-intellectualism in the past? Maybe around the time of UdSSR, or some German leader? Maybe some famous leader in Cambodia as well?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is the correct answer to the question the Guardian poses. I've lived among them and can 100% confirm this is how they think.

Elites is all about having a college degree and being "book smart" vs their "street smart" or "wise in the ways of man" sort of bullshit charlatans throughout history have used to make up for a lack of critical thinking skills.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It really is the right answer. But I think we can sharpen it if we look at how the media around Democrats elevates and highlights elitism as a quality to be pursued, for example, in a candidate.

A great example of this was the treatment of Pete Buttigieg, and specific media outlets elevation of him to a nationally relevant political actor. Harvard, then Oxford Rhodes scholar then a decade long McKinseyite (that alone should have disbarred him from running for president), then intelligence officer US Navy. He was the definition of "qualified" to the CNN and NPR editorial boards.

But how well had only political bonafides were a failed run for treasurer in Indiana, and a mayoral victory where he garnered all of 10k votes. So the guy has never actually won any significant state or federal elections. Yet in 2020, suddenly this guys is gets treated like a serious contender in the Democratic primary. Why?

Democratically aligned corporate press is obsessed with credentials, and specifically, the kind that comes from "elite" schools and organizations. Partially because they themselves also come from these elite schools and organizations.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

We really have become addicted to certifications and tags and qualifiers for everyone because it's easier to "understand" them at a glance and that's decided as all you need.

On paper is good enough for far to many, it's just easier to categorize people and move on.

Being in your categories is the easiest way to automatically think of then as moral and good because they must be, you are. It's fucked up both parties. Look at Eric Adams and Marco Rubio.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because projection, misinformation, disinformation, and political agendas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably for the same kind of reason that "everyone knows" that the corporate media is a "liberal media".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

"The media is liberal!"
"Who told you that?"
"The media."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Projection.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because the media continually accepts and perpetuates the right wing framing of everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because the media is owned and operated by rich men who benefit from putting the blame on others and calling it "news."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because democrats value egalitarianism and education. Good education is expensive. The businesspersons that have expended the most effort to offshore our jobs to the serious detriment of working-class America have had some of the most expensive and exclusive educations of all, and they are some of the wealthiest people on the planet… (conservatives fullstop here and ignore the rest: …who are also likely voting conservative). Couple that with the fact that expert (educated) advice and direction is often in direct conflict with the myopic goals and views of the uneducated. Don’t dump shit everywhere (but it’s cheap, easy, and fun to roll coal and pour used motor oil on the ground!), don’t cut down all the trees (but mah lumber is more expensive!), and maybe wear a mask (grandma was gonna die eventually anyways, at least I can bring her Covid from the Applebees take out!)

So it’s really easy for the conservatives to paint education = evil, and then of course they couple that with feel-good bullshit like “common sense” and small-town American wisdom that is completely meaningless but makes the uneducated feel smart or like they have control of their situation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Because the Democrats abandoned working class voters in the 80s and 90s to court the professional-managerial class in a pivot towards the center, and the Republicans were able to win over these disaffected blue-collar voters with resentment politics.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because Republican voters never, ever seek evidence or utilize basic critical thinking when their hatred steeped biases are confirmed.

A sufficiently hatemongering, and therefore trusted conservative talking head could say "Kamala Harris is a secret Aids Virus in a skin suit made of harvested fetuses made human size by George Soros' double secret reverse shrink ray!"

And you'd cue thunderous Republican voter applause with shrieks of "I FUCKING KNEW IT!"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Because it was always about projection.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/10/democrats-elites-trump-musk-republicans
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

because US politics is center right vs far right

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is one of the greatest scams that conservatives get away with IMO, not just in the US but it happens in the UK and other places too. Conservatives get in, go hog wild cutting taxes, selling off public assets and throwing huge contracts to their friends, and then as soon as the other side gets back in they find that they have to now balance the books, the conservatives start complaining and saying they're the fiscally responsible ones.

It's literally happening right now in the UK - we just got rid of the Tories finally after about 15 years, and the new Labour government immediately found a £20 billion hole in the economy which they now have to make harsh cuts to sort out, and they're the ones getting criticized for it by the media.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'd half agree; they could raise taxes instead of making cuts.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't say this around any conservative. They only believe in cutting taxes.

They always have these "household budget" analogies when it comes to the government, but even in a "household budget" situation one solution to overcoming debt is to find a way to raise your income so you can pay down the debt faster....Facepalm

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›