The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
If you have nothing to add to the conversation then shut the fuck up. You're annoying enough as is, but when you literally have no reason to post, then don't fucking post!
Careful, the bot fanbois will come to tell you to block it and then your comment will be deleted anyway
Careful, the rage apologists will come along and defend screaming at computer code.
You really should just block it though?
It's easy. It's wild to me that people just leave this feature on the table.
Lol why are you so mad at media bias bot?
I'm just mad that they post even when they don't have any contribution whatsoever.
Fuckin’ robots.
Bad bot
Hold on a sec, - just - hold up. You’re telling me, okay, the guy who can’t finish a thought at all, who lies all the time as a conversational style, who wears botched paint on his face with little raccoon cutouts for his beady, cloudy eyes, with his wet hair that goes to the middle of his back all whipped up like cotton candy, in a huge plastic girdle that makes him stand like the front-half of a centaur, with lifts in his shoes, and a high, whiny, grating voice with the jacking-off-two-giants-dance . . . .
You’re telling me he’s worse than the 2016 version? Cause all that’s the same.
he's louder.
and smellier.
Nailed it
I feel like I've seen this headline (and slight variants) multiple times in the past few weeks. It's almost a Gish Gallop statement, because where do you begin?
It implies that he had a grip 4/8 years ago.
It implies that he ever had a grip.
It implies that his public statements are weirder now than before, when they've always been bizarre.
It implies that Donald Trump's policy positions are peculiar to him, when really he's basically reflecting what Republicans have been trying to push on us for decades.
No, he's never had a grip, but there's been a noticeable change since even 2016. As there was a noticeable change to 16 from ten years prior. He's just gradually declining. It means nothing for his base that they are voting for a Vance succession, apparently.
He’s eating the dogs
He’s eating the cats
He’s dripping the Syphilis from his tiny mushroom 🍄 peen
He’s emboldened by his Syphilis induced dementia
Been saying for a couple of years that he went past a tipping point. Not sure when I noticed, 2021 or 2022? Not being funny, but I bet he won't be able to speak in public sometime in the next 2 years.
There was a great article where experts analyzed his speech patterns and it was eye opening.
Found it!
His cognitive decline might mean that should he win the election he could be less able to direct all his spite into action than during his 1st term. So his decline may be less scary than the writer thinks.
Yeah, probably not. When the Gipper lost his jellybeans, that was seen as a positive because he was easier to control/manipulate.
it is a good thing there are definitely not going to be any other assholes around him to help with it, then...
What, just now?
"grip" wasn't what drew republicans to trump in the first place, it was the authoritarian racism, and he's still got plenty of that, so they're going to support him again, because republicans realized that they could never win on their arguments in a secular egalitarian democracy, which is why they've sought to tear it asunder since the civil rights act, with the southern strategy in 1966. trump isn't a symptom, maga was always the goal.
I think the real tipping point for me was the day he had a press conference and started looking up at the sky and shouting that he was the chosen one. It seemed like he genuinely believed it and seriously expected god to come down from the heavens to praise him.
He what now
Eh, that just looks like his regular stupid theatrics to me
Yeah, remember when he thought it would be great to make fun of a disabled reporter in the 2016 campaign? That didn't hurt him, nor have the thousands of other things that would be disqualifying for anyone else.
Yep, it's absolutely insane. It has been now for 9 years. Insane.
Yes it's true that mainstream media has done a horrible job of handling his particular brand of terribleness, but it's not like the horrible things he said didn't hurt him. He lost in 2020, he's probably going to lose next month, he's lost in court multiple times, he's a convicted felon, the things he says do hurt him. But it takes a long time, of course because of bad reporting, but also because he was or is absurdly wealthy.
Weird. I thought he was totally sane in 2016. Stop voting for this weirdo that wants to fuck his daughter. Yes, his crimes are horrible, but the worst part about him is that he is so annoying.
I thought he was totally sane in 2016
That's because you didn't know about him. He's been pretty much a perv, crook and liar all his life.
When I was a kid in the nineties, I had a book of urban legends. One of them was about a couple who happened to encounter him in a broken down car and help him out, only to find out he had later anonymously paid off their mortgage. It's interesting sometimes to reflect on that story.
I’ve heard the same story about Bill Gates
I heard a story about Bill Gates on a private plane to the Caribbean.
I heard that one about Trump too
I fully assumed dude was being sarcastic.
Nah, dawg. I'm bigly serious.
Let him drag the entire GOP to hell with him.
Problem is he may take the USA down with him
Oh no.
Are you suggesting it's not a big deal if the usa becomes a fascist country?
Hey, you know how last time it took America, the British Empire, and the Soviet Union to beat fascism?
More than it currently is or...? I'm suggesting that it is not a big deal if the USA does anything. Fascist, slightly less fascist; very few people care.
If you're young...
Never, never, ever let Republicans forget this is who they are. If they try to claim less government or family values ever again, the response is Donald Trump.
That happened well before his first presidential run.
He has been mildly incoherent for a couple of decades. In the past most of his apparent dithering can be attributed to figuring out how to say something repugnant or false without becoming legally liable. As his mind decays this meandering style of speech has become untethered. He can't remember the complicated web of lies anymore. I wonder how much self awareness he truly has.