I just assumed it would be Nvidia because they powered the first gen also
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
1 points (54.5% liked)
Hardware
130 readers
19 users here now
A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
Nvidia having a better product is no surprise, it's always been a question of price.
My understanding was that Nvidia had better performance at 4-5w handheld range but AMD had better performance in the 25w+ docked range. Nintendo just decided that handheld performance per watt was more important.