this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
385 points (98.0% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
559 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am shocked. Shocked! /s

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a little cringe isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

~~Google~~ Mozilla shutting down yet another project:

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't get why, I can't see this be difficult or costly to run, but then again I have no clue, never ran a Mastodon instance.

I would assume that it's not worth the small reach compared to running X / Bluesky / Threads accounts but then again, like I said, the cost must be super small. 🤷

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Running the server probably costs about $100 per year, plus one person's $180,000 salary

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure why they created one to begin with

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Are they still running a matrix instance?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I would be mad if this would be next to fall since I use it. I don’t self-host Matrix since it is too expensive being built on a fundamental ‘eventual consistency’ model mirroring all text & attachments for all users in every DM & room to your storage—not to mention the Python implementation server & even the Rust one use much more system resources than other open chat options. It’s the same for Mastodon specifically too which but Ruby this time—with eventual consistency chewing up GiBs of storage making small players shut down instances. I would not be surprised tho if their Matrix server fell next just based on hosting cost.

Wanting to get folks off proprietary garbage like Slack, Telegram, & Discord was the right idea but moving to Matrix will prove to be a mistake as nodes are too expensive to run therefore leads to the centralization we need to escape. With the poor performance of the flagship Element client too, casual users think it is too damn slow (literally takes 2 minutes to even get to a screen with text in my browser & it isn’t even done syncing). There are more mature technologies with lower running costs that could have/should have/can be embraced.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

Unfortunate, but not unexpected.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How defeatist of you, Mozilla. Whatever happened to your pride? Oh, it went a long time ago when you make a big deal about going 3.0 and how you claimed to have improved Firefox's performance. Been a long time, but Firefox remains ever more the same as it did way back then, just cluttered with more features that weighs it's performance.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (12 children)

The only thing you need to know about how Lemmings think about politics is that they bash Mozilla more than Google.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Perhaps they didn't want to associate with Meta.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›