this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
247 points (93.6% liked)

politics

18966 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 124 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If you're cool with sending an 18 year old to battle, you should be cool with letting them vote

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also can we please just let them have a beer, too?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

If I'm going to be forced to die in a desert for some rich dude profit margin I'm going to do whatever the fuck I want

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

No no, if we let them vote they might vote for people who want to not send 18 year olds to war

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 year ago (7 children)

10 is old enough to be a mom.

16 is old enough to fall into a meat vat.

18 is old enough to give them a rifle.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Old enough to raise a whole ass human, slaughter edible living things, slaughter edible flying living things... but not old enough to decide what changes affect your community.

Wow.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

18 is old enough to decide to owe 200k on an education

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

18 is old enough to give them a rifle.

Actually 17 with parental consent.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I did hunter safety when I was 12 in Wisconsin.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

12 is old enough to enter the workforce without a permit or parental consent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Man, the GOP just loves making the core tenet of Democracy inaccessible to anyone and everyone who isn’t rich and white.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Let's be honest: if youth these days were inclined toward the right, Republican contenders would be fighting to 'defend' youths' right to vote from non-existent left-wing 'threats'.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Shit, they'd be fighting to lower it to 16.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'd rather go the other way and restrict voting to folks under 70. At least 18 year olds are going to have to live with the consequences.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago

This demographic I'm not popular with shouldn't be allowed to vote

Sounds like the terrorist GOP

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The party of forced birth for child rape victims says what?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Let’s call this what it is: a call to repeal the 26th amendment

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Misleading headline. What it should say is:

GOP Contender Vivek Ramaswamy Thinks Voting is A Privilege to be Earned

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

And that is far, far scarier.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, well I feel 37 is too young to run for president. Maybe he should pause his campaign.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

The GOP is too corrupt to breathe our air.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I saw that interview where said democrats are genetically different than republicans, so fuck him.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Wait, what?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can go die in a war at 18, but can't buy a gun until you're 21

Can't drink beer until you're 21, but can vote in general elections at 18

We need to just pick one and go with it, either 18 or 21

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was in a US history class in high school when the teacher said that the drinking age used to be 18, and the voting age used to be 21, but they switched places. He then asked "Why?" And started calling on random students.

When I got picked, my answer was "Fewer drunk voters?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Wasn't there this whole defining thing for America? Something about taxation without representation, right? So the 18 year olds have to pay taxes on the wages they earn by working and therefore should be able to vote. The retired, however...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Coming from the guy who never voted until he was 30. Who has never had any experience in politics at all...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Ramaswamy ding-dong.

If you're old enough to die for your country, you're old enough to vote. Period.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Whoever this guy is

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I kind of agree. 16 is way too young to legally drive, 18 is way too young to be able to join the military, 60-whatever is way too old for retirement, etc.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In a perfect world, I would agree. But in this Mephisto timeline, we gotta work with what we got.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Shit, even Mephisto would be like "Y'all too fucked up for me. I'mma bounce."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

He likely doesn' he just know what the GOP wants to hear.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Then make sure they pay zero taxes of any kind please.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This person doesn't think anything, he is paid to parrot statements for Supreme Court Justice owning billionaires.

"...gonna be on the trail... See you out the trail!"

load more comments
view more: next ›