this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
278 points (95.7% liked)

Firefox

17942 readers
134 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/20260243

Google Chrome warns uBlock Origin may soon be disabled

Google Chrome is now encouraging uBlock Origin users who have updated to the latest version to switch to other ad blockers before Manifest v2 extensions are disabled.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I really wish there was a GPL-licensed rendering engine and browser, accepting community funding, with some momentum behind it.

I feel Ladybird have correctly identified the problem - that all major browsers and engines (including Firefox) get their primary source of funding from Google, and thus ads. And the donations and attention they've received show that there is real demand for an alternative.

But I think the permissive license they have chosen means history will repeat itself. KHTML being licensed under the LGPL made it easy for Google to co-opt, since it was so much easier to incorporate into a proprietary (or more permissively licensed) codebase.

There is Netsurf, but the rendering engine understandably and unfortunately lags behind the major ones. I just wish it was possible to gather support and momentum behind it to the same extent that Ladybird has achieved.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm probably wrong, but isn't the Mozilla License non-permissive? It's likely more complicated than that. Non-permissive*

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

even when there are 'no options', there are always options

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I used to be partial to Konqueror in the past. I wish it was still actively maintained and developed.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›