Is named
actually running as the bind
user inside the container ? Maybe a USER bind
line below the RUN
lines will help.
Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
Resources:
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
It should technically do that already, but as extra insurance I'm running it with the -u bind
flag in ENTRYPOINT
. The problem was solved with a chmod 755
Make sure the user "bind" and whatever the owner of that folder outside of the container is, have the same user number.
Thank you, I'll keep that in mind. I didn't actually mount volumes into the container yet, the problem was solved upon changing to chmod 755