this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)

Canada

7166 readers
301 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Someone explain why having politicians on social media is a benefit in any way..

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Because gov't at any level should be using open platforms to communicate with citizens....

"Come join our roundtable discussion on.... Facebook"

Thats the opposite of transparency and open participation

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

"The last thing I want is for our politicians and government agencies to be accessible to the public or, even worse, to be able to reach as many as are interested in hearing what they have to say!"

I'd far rather they be on the fediverse, preferably on their own instance(s), than on Facebook or Twitter.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Politicians are already on social media. What we need are government departments on social media. CRA and justice, at a bare minimum, should be on social media.

It also wouldn't hurt my feelings to have a "lemmy.gov.ca" instance with communities for parties, politicians, and every government department and ministry.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Im not canadian but I think this is a bad idea. If they spend money on it they will want to control it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The decentralized nature of the fediverse means nobody can "control" it really. You can have control over your own instances and that's pretty much where it stops. I doubt the Canadian government would want to run more than a Mastodon instance like we've seen in the EU for open communication.

I would rather they invest in this with a tiny tiny sum to keep open communications available with the populace as compared to being beholden not only to corporations, but corporations that are generally outside of our jurisdiction.

[โ€“] LeFantome 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I worry less about technology and more about legislation. The Canadian govt has shown quite a willingness to regulate the Internet in all kinds of clueless and dangerous ways.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Thats my worry too.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I would not be worried at all about our government wanting to control the Fediverse because they handed over some cash to finance developmentโ€”at most they'd stop putting in more cash after the next election cycle. It's just not how our government behaves (we have more issues with them being unwilling to take over things when the citizens actually want them to).