this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
352 points (98.1% liked)

News

23014 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former president accused Judge Juan Merchan's daughter of presenting a conflict of interest, possibly violating a gag order

Donald Trump launched yet another attack against the daughter of New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, who is overseeing the trial regarding the former president’s alleged hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump shared a link to a New York Post article about the judge’s daughter, who has consulted to Democratic campaigns, and wrote, “This is a disgrace to our Legal System. Judge Merchan should be immediately sanctioned and recused, and this fake ‘case,’ only kept alive by the Highly Conflicted Judge, should be completely dismissed right away.” The post included photos of Merchan’s daughter. Rolling Stone has withheld her name as she is not involved in the case.

Trump has attacked the judge’s daughter at least three other times in the last week. The judge issued a gag order on Tuesday — hours after Trump attacked his daughter — barring the former president from discussing witnesses and others involved in the case. On Thursday, District Attorney Alan Bragg requested Judge Merchan clarify whether the gag order applies to Trump’s attacks against the his daughter, and if not, he asked the judge to expand the order to include her and others.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 263 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Boy, sure would be nice if there were literally any consequences at all for him, wouldn’t it?

[–] [email protected] 63 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Everyone's afraid of him because of his mob and death threats, personal career consequences and the possibility that he comes back to power in which case all of the above multiplied.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Letting fear make your decisions is not something a public servant should be doing. Most people call cops out for that sort of thing so why would we tolerate it from a judge who is in an arguably more important position?

Ideally public servants would be more afraid of what the public will do to them if they don't do the right thing but we've let ourselves be "civilized" to the point that they know nothing will happen.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The public hasn't been violent enough for a long time. No one is scared of the public.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That’s not what fox news says. I’m told if you live in one of those big cities you’ll get murderized immediately, probably by a illegal or on o’ them diverse people!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Yes but that's vastly different then convincing them that the hand feeding them just enough table scraps to keep from starving is sitting on a hoard.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

so why would we tolerate it from a judge who is in an arguably more important position?

Because the person being tossed into jail could very well become the most important position. No nation is above political retaliation and the reality of a mob murdering the judge and daughter and then subsequently getting full pardons from that most important position is a non-zero value.

Given the weakness that exudes from Congress on Impeachment, there's zero ramifications for such a situation. And given the nature of Trump, there's zero compunction that would ever keep him from this situation arising.

Everyone fears the "official" acts that Trump can carry out. Smarter people understand the non-official actions that he can give a nod to and give comfort to. That's how truly corrupt governments work, not by official acts, but the non-official ones.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not ever doing anything to punish him makes it feel like voting is meaningless. Why participate in a system that doesn't even pretend to hold someone who flagrantly breaks the law and ignores judge's orders with zero repercussions?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

You just hit on one of the main reasons a lot of folks think we are watching the decline of the US to… something. Could be a failed state, could be dictatorship/fascism. Could be a handful of smaller countries. Nobody really knows at this point. The future just doesn’t look real bright, and hasn’t for awhile.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

If you stay the course, you will have another Putin. Better to get the retaliation of his constituents out of the way now.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So you mean if the left acts a bit violently we could have better healthcare, higher minimum wage, enshrine abortion rights, transition into green energy, stop funding genocide, toss insurrectionists into jail, and all other good stuff?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yes and no. The right can act violently with little consequences - witness Oklahoma bombing, Ammon Bundy and the Jan6 insurrectionists. The left, and any associates would have been immediately stomped into the ground, like 6 feet under, because the right has big money backing it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Timothy McVeigh was killed by the state for Oklahoma.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Oklahoma bombing is a bad example. I'd go with the right wing groups that attack protests held by the left.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

“Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.” - John Stuart Mill, 1867

[–] [email protected] 114 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 60 points 7 months ago

I look forward to seeing a judge that is brave enough to throw this dude in jail for being in contempt of court. Someone if going to have to risk their wellbeing in order to do that.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There were some people, I can't remember who they were, that regularly chanted about locking someone up...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah but then they drained the swamp, mmm hmmm. Which was nice.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sort of like how Elon was going to rid Twitter of bots once he bought the company.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, he doesn't need bots to manipulate Twitter anymore.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's still filled with them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Yes, but he let a sink in. Don't forget about the sink. And on top, nobody understands manufacturing better, he invented space travel and he's the most american American that can americans.

From Africa.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago

LOCK HIM UP

[–] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago

For the most people in jail per capita with the most heavily militarized police force and practically zero accountability, this nation is a fucking joke at enforcing the law on rich white men.

Which, of course, is the entire point.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

Take the kid gloves off, treat him like a normal defendant, what would happen to a normal person if they used stochastic terrorism against a Judge's family?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

He totally deserves that 10 day, 60% reduction in his obligations.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago

Ooh, ooh, now do Clarence Thomas, you orange piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Next time they issue a gag order for him, it should include an actual ball gag and Chinese finger cuffs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Chinese finger cuffs

Can't find one small enough for those little sausage fingers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

He could just put both of his entire hands into one

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is he still going for the “provoke a punishment that could be seen as an overreaction so he can appeal and win easily”-thing or is he a dumbass just as usual?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

Until he faces consequences for this, there is no downside to him.

And the longer it takes for there to be consequences, the better it is for him when they happen, as it is increasingly attributed to him "being right" to his cult.