this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
34 points (85.4% liked)

News

23014 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Last week’s temporary law enforcement surge operation netted arrests of 71 suspects, the recovery of 145 stolen vehicles and the seizure of four crime-linked firearms, the governor’s office said. There were $60,000 worth of stolen electronics recovered, and one of the four firearms seized was a ghost gun, CHP said.

Suspects were arrested for charges including auto theft, drug possession, felony gun possession, possession of stolen property, DUI and outstanding warrants. Cases will go to the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office for prosecution, according to the governor’s office.

I'm deeply conflicted because I believe ACAB (to a point) but also Oakland has not felt terribly safe since the pan. The downtown area has declined as many professionals are wfh, allowing the once-busy area to feel empty and deserted. I discovered an amazing sandwich shop only about three weeks before they went out of business. My partner befriended someone right before they moved cities because they felt unsafe.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

This doesn't have to conflict with acab.

  • This only happened because police ignored their duties for a prolonged period.
  • There's no mention of how many people were killed or beaten in the process of this surge.
  • Police only try to create positive news when they absolutely have to, after the surge enforcement can be nonexistent again.
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

I’m deeply conflicted because I believe ACAB (to a point) but also Oakland has not felt terribly safe since the pan.

Doesn't need to be conflict. The Oakland police department can remain deeply troubled, but a monopoly on force by bastards is better than a dozen organizations run by bastards exercising force freely.

[–] pan_troglodytes 2 points 9 months ago

the CBD is basically dead in many cities. too little too late

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m deeply conflicted because I believe ACAB (to a point) but also...

This is the problem with the ACAB idea. No matter how well functioning a society is, there will be crime. In order for that society to function, there needs to be an organization which investigates crimes and brings suspected criminals in to face an impartial justice system. A society which lacks any sort of justice system will quickly break down into vigilantism and tit-for-tat violence. While it's not necessary that the State be the one who employs this force, other options are going to have some insurmountable problems. For example, you could have private groups which investigate crimes and apprehend suspects. But, this then leads to issues of payment for these forces and favoritism. Imagine every corporation having it's own security force running around enforcing whatever version of "the law" their management decides to enforce. I really don't want to have to have a subscription to Amazon Prime Police. We could try to shift this to large, non-profit organizations, but this is still going to run into issues of how the organization is managed. In the end, policing is a natural place for the State to fill a need which shouldn't be focused on profit. And, assuming the State is reasonably representative of the people, this allows The People to have control over that force. Of course, State run police isn't a panacea to prevent problems. We've got plenty of them in the US to demonstrate that. But, the idea of a society without the State running the criminal investigation is utopian fantasy.

For a thought experiment. Let's imagine a society without a State run criminal investigation force (i.e. a police force). I'm a horrible person from a family of horrible people. One day I decide I don't like something you said, so I beat your skull in. To whom does your grieving family turn to, to investigate and prosecute me for my actions? Maybe the military. Then we just have policing from a non-specialized force, it's a police force in all but name. And it also has issues with a military style response in situations where such a response is wholly inappropriate. Do they turn to the community at large? Mob justice isn't new and this has been a historic solution. For active pursuit of criminals, there might be a Hue and Cry. But, what if the crime isn't detected until later? Mob justice also has some major issues with unfairly targeting the innocent and marginalized groups. Does your family just take action on it's own? This "worked" for the Hatfield and McCoy families. There just isn't a good solution which doesn't eventually boil down to a State or community run police force.

I don't want to defend individual cops. There are some pretty horrible ones on the books in the US. If you feel the need to write "your fucked" on the dust cover of your firearm, you shouldn't be a cop. And that's one of the major issues with policing in the US. For many areas there is neither the perception nor the actuality of accountability. For a police force to function, it needs the trust of the people, and that's all kinds of broke in the US. That ACAB is even a thing demonstrates that quite clearly. Policing in the US needs a reset. The originall Peelian Principals would be a damned good place to start. But, entrenched interests and stupid policies (see: the war on drugs) make this a near impossibility. I don't have answers. But I will say that ACAB isn't it. So, don't feel bad about "betraying" that idea. It's lazy thinking which doesn't solve anything and is divorced from reality. Instead we have a lot of hard thinking and hard work to do to fix policing in the US.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 9 months ago

You don’t even need a thought experiment. The hard data is there. Police in my are, for example, cut enforcement by more than 60% back during the pandemic. Crime and civil violations shot through the roof to the point of chaos. I don’t remember the exact number, but it got bad, ignore the fact we already have some of the highest gun crimes in the country.. They finally stepped up enforcement a bit the middle of last year and crime dropped measurably, but it is still higher than 2017-2018.

I am sure this has been a familiar thing across many cities.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago

Good first step. Next, recall Pamela Price.