this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)
DevOps
833 readers
1 users here now
Development & operations
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Haven't used it myself, but every person I know that tried Pulumi ended up going back to Terraform. From what I'm given to understand it is fine for small projects, but runs into problems at scale.
Personally I don't like the default SaaS/account required model in Pulumi. I have lots of things to dislike about Terraform, but that isn't one.
Mind you too with either tool you (or your devs) will still deal with Dockerfiles and Kubernetes manifests, you just would use Pulumi or Terraform or whatever to manage them.
Lastly: I have done the jump from Ansible to Terraform myself. If you have a large amount of machines to manage and want to minimize transition pains then don't just use vanilla Terraform, but instead go for a platform like env0 or Spacelift, or at least use Terragrunt to manage your plans.
We're completely self hosted. Even our k8s cluster is provisioned by us on the baremetal servers we have rented from a third party vendor. So we cannot rely on tools that are not transparently free, seeing pulumis SaaS model is a great downside that I was not paying attention to before you pointing it out.
It's not mandatory to use pulumi cloud, you can selfhost, or use any object storage backend.
https://www.pulumi.com/docs/concepts/state/