this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
508 points (97.7% liked)

Gaming

20065 readers
64 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 158 points 8 months ago (10 children)

The microtransactions are bad enough, but the fact that none of these were present in the build given to reviewers just makes it worse. I mean people would still be complaining about them, but I don't think the backlash would be as bad if Capcom had made it clear from the start that the game was going to be riddled with microtransactions.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Any reviews released in the first week of a game should be taken with a grain of salt and any reviews released on or before launch day should be completely discarded.

With all the 'day one' patches games have, reviewers should be playing the game from launch, on the same version as everyone else. If they have any integrity.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

If they have any integrity

Haaahahahaha

Sorry, not laughing at you, the idea of game journalism having any integrity. That said, it's likely an issue with editors pandering to their CEO or other boss, but still.

[–] flumph 0 points 8 months ago

Appreciate you giving credit where credit is due. It is 100% corporate greed.

Kotaku’s editor-in-chief has resigned

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)