this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
-17 points (5.3% liked)

Conservative

384 readers
60 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (8 children)

opposing hate speech laws

Just like obscenity. You know it when you hear it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (7 children)

That problem with that approach is its basically your subjective definition of what's obscene or hateful. I mean, that's fine usually. When it comes to laws, though, that affect not just you, it's important to have a definition of it, or to clearly characterize its elements so that one can argue what hate speech is.

Naturally, our country doesn't have a legal definition of it, so, hate speech doesn't exist legally.

In contrast, Germany, with its unique history, does have hate speech laws: Section 130 of the German Criminal Code prohibits "Incitement of Masses" (Firefox translated this for me.. )

  1. Whoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or downplays an act committed under the rule of National Socialism of the kind indicated section 6 (1) of the Code of Crimes against International Law in a manner suited to causing a disturbance of the public peace incurs a penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeded five years or a fine.

This one sounds like something fearful capitalists would implement for Communism lol.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (5 children)

How do you define it? Germany has laws around their socialist past. Should America have laws against socialism and democrats since that is where the Nazis got their ideas?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

There is a fundamental (and probably intentionally) failure of history here.

Germany was never socialist, nor were the nazis. Just as North Korea is technicallt callee the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea" while not being a republic or democratic, the nazis weren't socialists because they have the word socialism in their official name. Official names can, and in this case are bullshit. There was a socialist movement in Germany, but the nazis co-opted and destroyed socialism. Many of the political prisoners in the holocaust were communists and socialists, taken away because they were communist or socialist.

Should America have laws against socialism and democrats since that is where the Nazis got their ideas?

The nazis didn't get any ideas for socialism. They destroyed the socialist movement, as it was antithetical to their goals.

But they did learn from the U.S., and how the conservatives in Texas treated immigrants. At the time, they would only allow people of color through if they went through harsh chemical cleaning treatments under the guise of getting rid of lice. The nazis took that idea and ran with it. And nowadays the U.S. treatment of immigrants is not much better thanks to conservatives.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)