Taylor Swift

533 readers

9 users here now

General Taylor Swift discussion. Welcome all Swifties!

Bring your clown hats, your wild theories, and your hype, this community is for you.

Some basic guidelines:

Posts should be about Taylor Swift
- "Shoehorned" articles about Taylor are considered not relevant.
Criticism of Taylor is fine, but open trolling or low effort posts like "Her music sux" will be removed.
Downvote trolling is actively monitored. Downvotes are enabled and welcome, but if all that you do is downvote, it will result in bans. Join the discourse, if you don't like this community feel free to block it. Admins have the ability to see votes by user, and we use that ability here.
General "Don't be a dick" rules apply, no trolling, no being a jerk
No NSFW. This is a fun Swiftie community. NSFW is banned here.
Use the "spoiler" tag generously when it comes to Tour spoilers. Pictures and outfits are fine, but streams/setlists should be marked. (Remember while the US tour is winding down, our global Swifties are just ramping up)
- Add [Spoiler] to your title
- Use the spoiler text for any spoilers in comments/description (the triangle with the exclamation point)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

165

Taylor Swift Threatens Legal Action Against Social Media Account That Tracks Her Private Jet (www.billboard.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm a huge swiftie. That's not a lie. However Taylor's number one issue in my book is her absolute non-caring for the damage she's done to the planet.

This isn't a coincidence. It's not about stalking. Last week she was caught taking a 40 minute flight, releasing more carbon by herself then most of us do in an entire year.

I love Taylor, but it's shameful that she continues to do this. When she dated Joe the tracker showed she flew back and forth between England and New York on average 3 times a week. A week.

And she doesn't even bother to at least buy offsets or something. She could buy massive swaths of rainforest to preserve to make up for it and it'd barely make a dent. She could replant entire forests.

I love Taylor, but I'm ashamed she's hurting the planet so much without seemingly a care - and now trying to sue the people who expose her for it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Where is the line drawn when megaphoning public info is too much?

Not on private jets, the locations of which are public. You can keep asking the rest of the questions. The legal answers to which will vary by jurisdiction. But non-military air travel is public information at the aircraft level and nothing you said behind to make the case for changing that.

[+] [email protected] -10 points 9 months ago (8 children)

You totally sidestepped what I asked.

Just because it’s public info, should it be amplified for easy access for all to see?

If you had a stalker, would you want me to tell them when you’re in town and likely at home?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You're not asking relevant questions and the questions you're asking are at best unclear.

Just because it’s public info, should it be amplified for easy access for all to see?

What do you mean "should"? I don't believe anyone has a moral imperative to do so under most conditions, but they should retain the right to do so as they do now.

If you had a stalker, would you want me to tell them when you’re in town and likely at home?

No. I don't think you should be legally barred from it though if you obtained that information legally. Also stalking is already a crime. So what is it you're talking about?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)