this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
1926 points (98.2% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
7 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 335 points 9 months ago (25 children)

One of the stupidest trends of all time.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (22 children)

There is FOSS alternatives out there like Revolt or just plain old IRC which is good enough imo. The Discord bullshit is so annoying.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I have been playing with the idea of a documentation.org. Something publicly funded (mostly through corporate and individual donations) that hosts technical manuals, white papers, guides, links to video tutorials (likely YouTube), FAQs, and even links to Discord and/or forums if they exist. Documents are public, free to index (no login to view), version controlled and held in perpetuity.

Obviously there is much more to it, but I think we have reached a point where something like it is required.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Aren't you basically describing readthedocs.io?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

In the most technical terms, yes. The idea is not new or bizarre, but I see the same missteps repeated. For starters, the venture HAS to be a nonprofit with zero need for monetization. It will also need an inviting and easy to navigate user interface, accessible to the most nontechnical of users. You need to have a massive document library from multiple large players from day one, so you need to have a lot of contacts.

As I said it's not fully cooked, but I have spoken to a few people that could help me make it happen and they seemed open to it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)