this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023

376 points (99.5% liked)

News

23014 readers

19 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

376

Diversity offices on college campuses will soon be illegal in Texas, as 30 new laws go into effect (www.texastribune.org)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When Texas college students return to their campuses after the winter break, they’ll discover the lights are still off in their campuses’ diversity offices.

That’s because a new law that outlaws such work at the state’s higher education institutions goes into effect, Jan. 1.

Another 29 laws also will go into effect in the new year that aim to change the economy, tax codes and the criminal justice system.

...

Dissolving diversity, equity and inclusion efforts at public universities: Senate Bill 17 requires public universities to end so-called diversity, equity and inclusion work. Universities will also be unable to offer training on diversity and inclusion for its faculty and staff, or require diversity statements in hiring processes. Universities must also confirm to the Legislature between legislative sessions that they are in full compliance.

...

The law’s restrictions do not apply to class instruction, materials needed for federal grant applications or student organizations on campuses, but multiple university officials have said the law has made hiring new faculty more difficult.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm going to run around making claims and when people disagree I'll make them have evidence!

If you claim these offices are worthless and that this is a good policy then prove it. It's not the defense's job in an argument to prove their point. Anything asserted without evidence can be equally dismissed without evidence.

Anyway here's an academic study stating that exposure to diversity improves cultural awareness and political involvement: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02680930210127577

Here's a statement from an inter-collegiate group on these programs:

"Data shows, DEI efforts help create an academic community that generates a higher enrollment rate, matriculation rate, and eventual success rate. DEI is for students with disabilities, veterans with PTSD, minority students, and students who are New Americans who may need extra help due to language or cultural barriers. DEI helps more students achieve the American Dream of success via a college education." Source

[+] [email protected] -9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Knowing that something failed you and stating it does not call for being preached to by someone who the system obviously worked for. This is just the flip side of the "I know better than you" coin.

This type of educated bullying is also not the answer, or response that gains results.

People have opinions and experiences with out having to back them up with studies and papers . Your response is maddening in the way that it only serves a cooling effect on actual sharing of experience and input..... which cools all that lovely diverse , straggler input.

You sound like you're hiding feelings behind papers and studies.

What is so hard about using what you learned without quoting all you know?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hey quick question, what the fuck are you talking about?

The other guy started this.

do these offices actually achieve anything?

I responded with a list of things that they do

do you have any evidence to back up these claims

I responded with why I didn't need evidence to make my point, then provided it anyway.

Maybe I could be perceived as snarky and mean, but I suspect the commenter suggesting the removal of diversity, equity, and inclusion offices in places where we shape the future of our society might not be sincerely posing the question.

What is so hard about using what you learned without quoting all you know?

Literally the 2nd highest upvoted comment on this post and the first response to the commenter is me doing just that

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

My point is mostly this: are we here to discuss and provide information or throw paper at each other. The comment you responded to wasn't one I agreed with either ,but it was based on their opinion and (imo) not worth arguing because opinions are subjective. It is worth considering becasue they are telling you about their personal, if ancesdotal, experience.

So when people completely miss the opportunity for conversation about something that appears controversial, and rather pile on because they are daring to have an opinion..... well ya , I say something.

I've been around long enough to see institutional thinking crush community and conversation and I don't like it. So there is my subjective opinion and feedback.