this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
312 points (98.1% liked)

3DPrinting

15644 readers
259 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Got this email from Autodesk that Fusion is increasing their annual price by a huge amount. I subbed for 1 year a couple years ago for I think $380. Then I was able to get an educational sub after that. Fusion is still the cheapest CAD software out there, not including the free stuff like FreeCAD, but still, this price increase is massive.

It should be noted that it's still free to use for personal use minus the extra features.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago (8 children)

So if you make 1000$ in a year from modeling, 680 goes to fusion360

[–] namingthingsiseasy 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just use the same creative^W standard accounting practices that all other companies use. Take Google for example... we all know that they don't pay any taxes, because they don't earn any positive revenue. Right?

So I'd like to use the same approach. I would not be the one making $1000. That would be my, um, cousin, who just happens to live in Bermuda. HE is the one making all that money, not me! So I don't have to pay the $680, right?

(By the way, can I also stop paying taxes and be worth a trillion dollars now? No? Why not?!?!)

load more comments (7 replies)