this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
371 points (100.0% liked)

196

16508 readers
2312 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Escape from Tarkov ๐Ÿ˜ฉ

I really want to play that game, but the devs are working against me.

[โ€“] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The whole genre is hilariously incompetent. It SHOULD be easy for somebody to come along, make an actually good extraction shooter, and cash out, but every time they do something dumb to screw it up.

Marauders was a blast for a short period of time before they made the mistake of listening to their community and made it Tarkov But Worse

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do you have a moment to talk about our lord and savior Hunt: Showdown?

The best extraction shooter out there.

It has zombies. It has wild west. It is balanced. It takes two shots to kill and two minutes to reload. Come to the Bayou!

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I agree that Hunt is a great game, I think it's a bit dishonest to compare it to Tarkov. I guess it's my own fault for saying "extraction shooter" since Hunt IS a Shooter where the goal is to Extract something, but the economic component is paper-thin, to the point that it barely matters.

A strength of Tarkov is the frequent wipes. This isn't me saying Hunt should do the same - it's a different game. Rather that I want a game with an emphasis on economic risk, like Tarkov, but made by a developer with the competence of Crytek.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I wasn't aware of what you are looking for specifically in a game.

I switched from Tarkov to Hunt a while ago and never looked back, so I like to recommend it to others.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)