this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
103 points (100.0% liked)

News

76 readers
2 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

Advances in technology allow prank callers to mask their voice, phone number or IP address, or make their false 911 calls sound more credible.

Author Patrick Tomlinson and his wife, business owner Niki Robinson, have been "swatted" at their home in Milwaukee more than 40 times, often resulting in police pointing guns at their heads. Their tormentors have also called in false bomb threats to venues using their names in three states. Yet law enforcement hasn’t been able to stop the prank calls.

The couple’s terror comes as these incidents appear to be on the rise in the U.S., at least on college campuses. In less than a single week in April, universities including Clemson, Florida, Boston, Harvard, Cornell, Pittsburgh, Rutgers and Oklahoma, as well as Middlebury College, were targeted by swatters.

To combat the growing problem, the FBI has begun taking formal measures to get a comprehensive picture of the problem on a national level.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

Isn't FBI too high level to prevent swatting? Seems like if the local police are getting sent out, any solution would have to happen at that level instead.

Like if the local PD couldn't figure it out with 43 reported swattings on the couple mentioned in the story, how is a national database going to help?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Any one, from any where in the world, can do it.

Between VPNs and VOIP phones, it’d almost impossible to sort out whose legitimate and whose not without showing up.

As a short term fix, people who are frequently swatted, usually coordinate with the local/responding cops so that if there’s a call at their adress, they call first before breaking down doors

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As a shorter term fix, not murdering people based on a simple phone call would also fix the problem.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

That's insane, what's next? Not killing the dogs, not destroying property, and maybe even getting tried for crimes they committed!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah this was my thought as well.

The problem here is pigs murdering people without evidence.

I'm not confident the FBI is going to solve that problem.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Being "scared" is all they need to commit murder...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not nearly that simple, though.

that a bomber might set off a bomb if cops showed up and asked if everything was okay.
Or that abusive spouse whose menacing their partner with a kitchen knife and tossing around the kids might start getting all stabby.

over twenty-thousand people in the US have died THIS YEAR, so far, from gun violence. there's been over a hundred and fifty mass shootings. Ten million adults in the US and far, far too many children, are victims of domestic violence.

You are thinking of this problem from the premise that the call is false. the reality is the cops have no way to know that, and the safest response- for everybody involved- is in fact coming in hard and fast and ending whatever is going on.
Yes a few people have died.
yes, it is an extremely traumatic experience.
YES, cops- generally speaking- really should stop killing people. We can agree on that.

The alternative to cops not repsonding to reports of bombs, of domestic violence or active shooters.... is letting bombers bomb shit and letting Stabby Mcstabberson continue to beat the living shit out of the rest of the McStabberson Family, and letting assholes run around killing people.

Look at what happened in Uvalde. 911 call reported an active shooter. cops responded. Active shooter was found in a school. Cops didn't go in... kids died. More kids died than if responding officers had followed decades-old protocol of going and engaging immediately.
Yes, I get the outrage. I may even agree with it. We should not have to live in this shithole of a world. But we do, and it's not as simple as "well, we shouldn't do that."

(sorry for the formatting edits,)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

When has the SWAT team ever helped anyone?

This is not a rhetorical question. I'm genuinely curious as to how they have helped people because I don't really understand what they do besides steal drugs and resell them. They certainly don't seem to help with active shooters or domestic violence that I've ever heard of. Totally open to being wrong though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

When has the SWAT team ever helped anyone?

Not very often

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

probably far more often than you or I hear about. I know in our local city they're hitting warrants up on a weekly basis ("Warrant Wednesdays". They fuck it up it's going to be national news for months. they do their job the way it's supposed to be... nobody even knows they really exist, right? except the bad guys and the courts and other cops.

I don't know how often the whole "barricaded subject with hostages" happens... but I do know about that one time where I had a belligerent guy waving a knife around- they probably saved his life compared to what other cops would have done. (i work in contract security. this was years ago when I was still sitting a post.)

I'm not saying they're perfect... but there's always going to have to be somebody, armed in that way. utopian societies don't come from dystopian societies. Utopian societies frequently become dystopian.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)