this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
561 points (98.8% liked)

Not the Onion

2143 readers
1 users here now

For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Reading the actual article instead of just the headline, here's a summary of their arguments. There are multiple powder keg situations around the world that are either exploding or simmering. Iran and its proxies, Russia and Ukraine, China and Taiwan. They could all turn into an interconnected war at any moment. Yet markets, which supposedly factor in these possibilities, are still very high.

What this is not saying is that another world war would be secondary to investor yields. They make that explicit:

This scenario would of course place financial damage a long way down the list of horrors.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Yeah I'm not seeing the outrage on this one. It's The Economist. They discuss the economy. If Animals Monthly did a piece on the conflict, I'd expect it to be pretty focused on the impact to animals, and I don't think that means they're minimizing the humanitarian aspects of the conflict.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The Economist is also known for attempts at "wit" in some of their headlines. The title is surely riding the line of satire intentionally.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)