this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)
Vancouver
1434 readers
18 users here now
Community for the city of Vancouver, BC
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean such a policy is not insensible, electrically powered devices and saltwater don't mix well.
Definitely an accessibility issue, but not one that is trivial to solve.
How come they're allowed on BC Ferries but not Hullo?
There's a significant difference between the speeds and construction of the boats. Hullo is governed by the high speed craft code. Basically the concern is that a collision by one of these would be different than a regular ferry, and so there's limitations to what they can carry, and the emergency procedures they have to have in place.
Hopefully stories like this will help push for improvements to the regulation
Firstly, from the BC Ferries website:
That implies smaller ferries by BC Ferries don't have the same level of accessibility.
Second, BC Ferries is the operator on behalf of the BC government, so I think there is more of a push for better resident access, which BC Ferries holds Accessibility Committee meetings for. Hullo on the other hand is a private ferry company and so their priorities and the purpose of their vessels might be different, accessibility not being at top of mind over capacity, speed and availability of service (which translates to profit). Different regulations apply for vessels built for different purposes (the BC Ferries are not made for higher-speed journeys for example).