this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
766 points (95.0% liked)

Science Memes

10853 readers
2925 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (20 children)

I don’t think how hot humans feel works at all, it’s just arbitrary

Can humans survive 100 degree heat? Yes so it doesn’t represent 100%

150 for 3rd degree burns (almost instant), does Fahrenheit go off base 150? Also no

What about cold? Well -40 requires a lot of layers, so then +40 should be pretty hot for humans right? Nope, because it’s not related to humans at all

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

100°F was supposed to be average human body temp. Guy who made the scale fucked up his math and we ended up actually at 98.6°F

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah, that's a myth. It's actually a little more complicated than that, and the actual measurements changed over time.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

"the original paper suggests the lower defining point, 0 °F, was established as the freezing temperature of a solution of brine made from a mixture of water, ice, and ammonium chloride (a salt).[2][3] The other limit established was his best estimate of the average human body temperature, originally set at 90 °F, then 96 °F (about 2.6 °F less than the modern value due to a later redefinition of the scale)."

That's from your link. Seems like the guy you responded to was correct or the wiki isn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)