this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
90 points (88.8% liked)

Lemmy

12524 readers
10 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to [email protected].

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: This post now archived and as such no longer works

An external image showing your user-agent and the total "hit count"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Can countermeasures be implemented in the clients to mitigate privacy risks, while not having to proxy images?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

no. the remote server will log the requests based on the client address. it is a good argument for using a vpn.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh I mean, sure, but I don't think IP logging is the main privacy concern with spy pixels.

I'm assuming this trick uses the user agent string and other request metadata to identify clients. Even if it didn't recognize Jerboa as a client, it did guess that I was on mobile. That's not possible just by tracking IPs, unless they're cross-referencing it with other datasets. Also, I was on VPN anyway, so the IP would have been useless.

It should be possible for clients to obfuscate/fake the metadata of image requests to make tracking with spy pixels less effective.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yup, I'm parsing the user agent with the user_agents Python library.

load more comments (3 replies)