this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
72 points (97.4% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
6604 readers
616 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think that both collective action (politics) and individual action are necessary. Both feed on each other in a positive spiral. Neither one is less important than the other. And arguments that dismiss either harm the cause as a whole.
For one, because every choice you make to support a cause or goal makes you more likely to continue supporting it. Action builds commitment. The more you think about the environment, the more actions you take because of the environment, the more dedicated you become and the more actions you take in future. Trying to live a environmentally sustainable lifestyle gives a lot of people the motivation to engage in collective action in support of that lifestyle.
For another, because when people live in an environmentally sustainable way, and are less likely to be personally harmed by environmental legislation, it makes it easier for them to vote for it. It's a lot easier to vote for a gasoline tax if you don't drive. Or for regulations on factory farms if you don't eat meat. If you already replaced all your old light bulbs with LEDs, a government mandate on energy efficient light bulbs won't affect you, and you can vote for it without worrying about how much it'll cost you personally. In California, an attempt to phase out gas stoves was opposed by people who had gas stoves and liked them - if those people had been convinced to take individual action, and replace their old gas stoves with induction, they would have had no reason to oppose the phaseout.
Moreover, there's the issue of credibility. When you live your values, and your friends and family and neighbors see you living your values, your words in support of those values gain greater weight. Politics is the art of persuasion. If you want to convince other people to support collective action, your individual actions matter, because they show you believe what you say.
And finally, and to me most importantly - we should take individual action to live more sustainably and less wastefully because it's the morally right thing to do.
Yes, write your congressperson. And also, drive less, fly less, insulate your home properly, and eat more plants. And tell the people around you what you're doing, and why you're doing it.
Collective action and individual action are not separate. Like a previous generation said, the personal is political.
That's a very good point you bring up! I totally see what you mean and agree!
There’s also the fact that we vote with our wallets - if green products become more profitable, companies will pivot toward them, and visa versa. However, I feel your original point holds water inasmuch as making these issues out personal responsibility remove the onus of responsibility, and often the spotlight, from companies whose practices cause pollution. The plastic industry is a case in point - the idea that us recycling will solve the issue was put forward by the industry so that they wouldn’t have to take responsibility for their shitty actions. Quite often individual responsibility is pushed where national/international legislation is needed