Nuclear reactors I had to edit the title bc it autocorrected it to nuclear tractors at first lmao
On Friday, May 23rd, Trump signed an executive order to loosen federal regulations nuclear safety, and a Louisiana state news source posted the article.
To speed up the development of nuclear power, the orders grant the U.S. energy secretary authority to approve some advanced reactor designs and projects, taking authority away from the independent safety agency that has regulated the U.S. nuclear industry for five decades.
The order comes as demand for electricity surges amid a boom in energy-hungry data centers and artificial intelligence. Tech companies, venture capitalists, states and others are competing for electricity and straining the nation’s electric grid.
Sunday, there were sudden blackouts across several parts of Louisiana.
The outages on Sunday hit homes served by Entergy and Cleco in parts of Orleans, Jefferson, St. Tammany, St. Bernard and Plaquemines parishes. The popular Greek Festival along Bayou St. John was also affected, forcing it to take cash only for a period of time and extend its hours with free entry.
The outage raises questions about why the spike in electricity usage caught MISO, the grid operator that ordered the outage, off guard, local officials said. Some also alleged that MISO granted only a short notice for the outage directive.
Two nuclear power plants, both operated by Entergy, were out of commission as of May 23 and remained so on Sunday, according to the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s website and local officials. One was down for planned maintenance. The other went offline last week, and “tripped” as Entergy tried to bring it back online, Lewis said.
The grid operator is blaming higher than average temperatures, but it wasn't even that hot. I actually spent most of the day outside because it was pretty pleasant on Sunday.
Currently, Louisiana is trying to to fast-track environmental permitting for advanced nuclear projects under a bill that aligns the state with a national effort to accelerate next-gen reactor development and in April, Louisiana joined a lawsuit with several other states to challenge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s “utilization facility rule,” a licensing requirement that applies uniformly to all nuclear reactors, regardless of size or risk profile.
Landry said the state is amenable to the development of small modular reactors, or SMRs, with a capacity to produce up to 300 megawatts of electricity. By comparison, Entergy’s Grand Gulf Nuclear Station in Port Gibson, Mississippi, which provides part of the utility’s power, has more than 1,400 MW of generation capability
“Joining this lawsuit is about defending our ability to pursue advanced energy solutions like SMRs — solutions that are reliable, clean and essential for economic development in the State,” Landry said in a LDEQ news release. A 2022 research study from Stanford University that found small modular reactors may actually exacerbate challenges of highly radioactive nuclear waste, which makes the governor's statement seen a big misleading.
Mark Zuckerberg's Meta data center is still under construction in Louisiana, but as of May 16th, had caught the attention of House Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse for seeming to ignoring previous climate commitments, as well as the New Orleans based alliance for Affordable Energy, and the Union of Concerned Scientists for a lack of transparency and concerns regarding community pollution.](https://www.theverge.com/news/668934/meta-ai-data-center-gas-energy-climate-sustainability)
I feel like people of Louisiana should know that SNRs are not as a perfectly reliable and clean as the Governor might believe they are, so I posted an article about the bill on Reddit. There seemed to be a big influx of people in Louisiana that felt very strongly that this was the correct path for Louisiana, and that SNRs wouldn't pose the same risk as other nuclear reactors. Instead of arguing back and forth with them, I just decided to make a new post and include some information provided by the Union of Concerned Scientists in their article Five Things the “Nuclear Bros” Don’t Want You to Know About Small Modular Reactors
Even casual followers of energy and climate issues have probably heard about the alleged wonders of small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs). This is due in no small part to the “nuclear bros”: an active and seemingly tireless group of nuclear power advocates who dominate social media discussions on energy by promoting SMRs and other “advanced” nuclear technologies as the only real solution for the climate crisis.
Here are five facts about SMRs that the nuclear industry and the “nuclear bros” who push its message don’t want you, the public, to know.
-
SMRs are not more economical than large reactors.
-
SMRs are not generally safer or more secure than large light-water reactors.
-
SMRs will not reduce the problem of what to do with radioactive waste.
-
SMRs cannot be counted on to provide reliable and resilient off-the-grid power for facilities, such as data centers, bitcoin mining, hydrogen or petrochemical production.
-
SMRs do not use fuel more efficiently than large reactors.
Now I'm permabanned from my state's subreddit.

Or we could continue to just regulate them, and elect leaders that understand nuclear safety regulations have existed for the last 50 years for a good reason...
It's weird how they had no interest in expanding nuclear energy in Louisiana until they realized the gas powered turbines and giant LNG plant Landry has had in the works weren't going to be enough to keep these supercomputers running.
I guess regulated nuclear energy is too woke
any nuclear energy is progress.
Uhh... Do you know why they call Louisiana cancer alley?
Hint: it's not because there are way too many regulations/strict oversight of how businesses dispose of toxic waste.
Nuclear is by ridiculously far the safest form of actively generated energy, it causes less radiation than Coal and Gas and less deaths per year than fucking Hydro
Considering how your government literally nuked it's own people, maybe ask CIA what they're pulling in your area
Lol funny you should mention what the CIA has been up to here
It's actually kind of been this whole thing lately
Still don't see how that changes the fact that this state does not need to be trusted to further deregulate nuclear safety regulations? If anything, given the owner of Palantir is apparently obsessed with nationalism and the Manhattan project, I would say it makes a pretty good argument for why safety regulations should be reinforced if not increased.
We already have at least two nuclear energy plants, and even with current regulations in place, we just made this list that was released yesterday of the 13 worst locations for security violations in the U.S. nuclear power plants.
We're number 1 & 3...
The SNRs the governor wants to use and further deregulate in order to power these stupid AI databases are actually more difficult to monitor, generate more nuclear waste than traditional nuclear reactors and the safety features are more prone to failure in natural disasters such as flooding. So deregulating them in Louisiana, where it floods all the time, makes about as much sense as handing a fully loaded automatic weapon to a toddler.
I'm really not sure how anyone can pretend that generating massive amounts of nuclear waste isn't a problem, but you're definitely not the first person that seems to refuse to acknowledge that, and it honestly seems a little like propaganda on behalf of nuclear energy. At best it's misleading.
I'm not disagreeing that we should be moving towards increasing nuclear power, but I do think we need better safety enforcement and oversight (definitely not less) and better plans for what we actually do with the waste we generate.
People in Missouri are getting cancer in large numbers due to left over nuclear waste
We're literally still trying to figure out what to do with waste generated in WWII
The third worst nuclear disaster in history after Chernobyl and Fukishima, was caused by an explosion of buried nuclear waste in Kyshtym. It's just not as well known because of Russian propaganda that kept it covered up for decades. I'm sure they would have done the same in Chernobyl if they had been able to.
If there was any plan beyond getting rich quicker, and not caring who they hurt to do so, I would feel differently, but nobody, especially these people, should be allowed to have less regulations and oversight for how they handle nuclear safety.