this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
133 points (97.2% liked)

Linux

50823 readers
1089 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm admittedly yelling at cloud a bit here, but I like package managers just fine. I don't want to have to have a plurality of software management tools. However, I also don't want to be caught off guard in the future if applications I rely on begin releasing exclusively with flatpak.

I don't develop distributed applications, but Im not understanding how it simplifies dependency management. Isn't it just shifting the work into the app bundle? Stuff still has to be updated or replaced all the time, right?

Don't maintainers have to release new bundles if they contain dependencies with vulnerabilities?

Is it because developers are often using dependencies that are ahead of release versions?

Also, how is it so much better than images for your applications on Docker Hub?

Never say never, I guess, but nothing about flatpak really appeals to my instincts. I really just want to know if it's something I should adopt, or if I can continue to blissfully ignore.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Can I ignore flatpak indefinitely?

Sure, at least until software you want to use is flatpak only, e.g. Bottles

[–] Shareni 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Or use a stable distro, need a package newer than 2 years, and don't want spend a day compiling dependencies of dependencies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah, building from source takes a few minutes unless you are building a web browser.

[–] Shareni 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, show me how you compile Emacs 29/30 on a fresh Debian 10 install in a few minutes...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)
apt install build-essential
apt build-dep emacs
wget https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/emacs-30.1.tar.xz
tar -xf emacs-30.1.tar.xz
cd emacs-30.1
./configure —prefix=/usr/local
make
make install

Edit: forgot cd

[–] Shareni 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Did I ask for a command? Give that a try in Debian 10...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Ok, just did. Works fine.

Emacs 30.1 running in a Debian VM

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)