this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
1169 points (99.2% liked)

The Onion

5325 readers
1210 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Canadian government has insisted that information on domestic goods is readily available to all trading partners, even including nations that recently elected a felony-convicted game show host to be their head of state. Instead, the United States has decided to employ a rarely-chosen trade tactic that international economists refer to as the “fuck around and find out” model.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

As I said earlier, I believe blanket systems should be called out when they’re wrong. Maybe you missed that part.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

But isn’t the problem is that all blanket statements are wrong?

I mean there will always be an exception.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

I get that you love arguing. You’re pretty notorious for it. But unfortunately, I’m not going to fall for that shit.

It’s very clear for anyone to easily understand exactly what I am saying and with all due respect, I’m not going to get caught up in some derailment of the discount because you feel the need to lead me into one of your “gotcha” moments.

Blanket statements issued for the purpose of misleading people, or injecting a bias into the topic should be called out. That is what I said- that is what I meant.

I am not arguing semantics.

[–] emptyother 4 points 4 weeks ago

I'm thinking its clear to most people that a blanket statement like "americans choose this" didn't mean every individual american. It didn't need to be said. So saying it of course attracts arguments about the exact semantics.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)