this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37920 readers
476 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

Lol, Ed Zirtron is very paralleled.

He's pessimistic and cynical to the point of being conspiratorial and delusional.

He's someone to listen to when you want to hear someone go on an unhinged rant about the tech industry, not someone you listen to when you want to actually understand how it works.

I mean look at this trash article, he spends 5000 words saying effectively nothing. Things he could have explained by just linking to pre-existing, better written articles, instead, he rehashes everything in a snarky tone while skipping over some of the most important points (like training through distillation).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Literally. Al lhe said was China made an LLM with less. The end.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

If that was all he said, I would have no issue with that. But no, he spent 10,000 words padding that sentiment out with as much tripe and snark as he could.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

I feel that. I got 1/3rd through it and was wondering how the hell he managed to write so much with so little.

load more comments (12 replies)