this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
292 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

5491 readers
3369 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Perhaps it's a difference in communication experience, and effectiveness? Maybe the person who is already famous has lots of experience with talking to people and conveying information — perhaps they make more efficient use of a small amount of information — whereas the person with a lot of experience on the subject matter, but is poor at communication, is unable to effectively communicate the subject matter. One must be able to retain people's attention to effectively communicate; this takes skill.

[–] Mechaguana 2 points 1 day ago

It definitely is imo.

The fields jargon is necessary for the experts to talk effeciently to each other, then it becomes second nature for them.

Then, when they have to talk about their expertise to the public, nothing is retained, actionable or even understood, because there is simply not a common vocabulary backed by the same experiences.

At best you get a confused public, at worst they react with apprehension.

Youd need seasoned science communicators, capable to bridge the "culture" of the public and the one of the experts, which is hard.

Plus, the skills to become an expert are often very different to the ones that a science communicator needs, like summarising in an engrossing way, glossing over the right amount of boring details, empathy and patience for an unresponsive audience...

load more comments (1 replies)