this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
805 points (96.4% liked)
Greentext
4406 readers
1298 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Do women who you 'pork' like you refering to fucking thrm with that term?
I only use euphemistics if there is an established relation and consent to it.
At some point in my life I was with someone that had a kink for being called by terms I consider demeaning towards any human being, so I openly refused to do so and explained why I did it. The relationship ended shortly after.
Because I see sex in a couple dynamic as a corner stone for a healthy relationship, I always strived to be open about talking regarding limits, dos and donts. I like enjoying myself before, while and after being with my partner and making sure my partner does as well and laughing and goofing around is an integral part of it.
So, if there is mutual trust to throw around some silly dirty talk, yes, to answer your question, I would.
How is 'pork' an acceptable term for sex though? The euphemism you are implying with it is literally to 'fuck a piece of meat'. And pig meat at that.
This is not a cute or light hearted thing to imply when talking about sex. 'Fuck' is far less offensive a term for sex than 'pork'.
But sure, whatever, if the women you fuck do want sex with them to be spoken about like you're sticking your dick in pieces of pig meat, then by all means.
Just understand that it is disgusting and degrading to speak about sex this way publicly and you should really be more called out on it.
this is such a grossly uncharitable interpretation you can not be serious right now