this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

cybersecurity

3238 readers
1 users here now

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Community Rules

Enjoy!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
14
X-post: Better understanding and mitigating the risks of using a phone that no longer receives system updates (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Crosspost of an ongoing thread over at [email protected]

Some interesting discussions on the trade-off between security and being able to use your aging Android for a little while longer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nowadays people rarely attack individual random users. I believe the risk of running outdated software is super inflated and mediatic, 99% of people would be absolutely fine running a version of Android from 3 years ago or Windows 8.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I believe the risk of running outdated software is super inflated and mediatic, 99% of people would be absolutely fine running a version of Android from 3 years ago or Windows 8.

That's the same thing people running windows XP on internet were thinking in 2017.

Then WannaCry arrived and they got their data encrypted :)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WannaCry targeted hospitals, businesses and similar machines.

Your grandma using Android 9 is safe, don't worry.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

WannaCry targeted hospitals, businesses and similar machines.

WannaCry targeted everything with SMB exposed, blindly.

Also, you should read more about security through obscurity, the fact that "no one will target you because you are a low-value target" is a false sense of security.