Privacy

32177 readers

414 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Exposed: How Israeli Spies Control Your VPN (www.mintpressnews.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Kape Technologies is a major player in the online privacy world, one of the three giants that collectively control the market. It owns many of the world’s top VPNs, including ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, Private Internet Access, ZenMate, Intego Antivirus, and a host of tech websites that promote its products. Kape brands can be seen sponsoring a wide array of public figures, such as Tucker Carlson, Angry Video Game Nerd, Drew Gooden, Lex Fridman, Cody Ko, Uncle Roger, and Ben Shapiro."

"(Kape Technologies) It also bought a host of VPN review sites, such as vpnMentor and Wizcase – platforms that purport to supply readers with expert information about which VPN would be best for them. vpnMentor insists that this considerable conflict of interest does not affect their ratings."

What do you think of all this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

No, they don't. Because I don't use a shitty VPN provider.

Also the article doesn't load

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

Is your Nord VPN on? /S

Edit: Forgot this was sarcasm

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

I don't use JavaScript or Nord VPN

[–] refalo 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Not using javascript is like a huge beacon of light screaming just how unique you really are. There are several methods for fingerprinting you without JS, or even without CSS/HTML.

And the number of people not using JS being very small, it doesn't take as many bits of information to uniquely identify you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And basically 99% of the modern web doesn't work without JS. I don't know why there are still so many people running around and saying "disAblE jAvAscrIpT!!!!", yeah like how the fuck am I supposed to use the web??? At that point, I could also just delete my web browser, it would literally have the exact same effect.

[–] refalo 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think there's mainly two usecases:

the "weird" people who don't visit any mainstream sites and live under a rock
people who disable JS by default but are always adding exceptions for sites that need it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I tried the second approach for some time, but using NoScript became really annoying, since I never knew which scripts are necessary, and which are used for tracking or some other bullshit. It was always trial and error, and just felt tedious and unnecessary. I wish NoScript would have a built in whitelist of scripts that are known to be necessary for websites to function, this would avoid breakages and make it much more comfortable to use.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

You assume I'm just worried about privacy?

load more comments (3 replies)